Phillips L W
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1981 Mar;12(1):5-17. doi: 10.1016/0005-7916(81)90024-0.
Experimental psychology has contributed many empirical concepts and paradigms to behavioral theory and practice. While not all behavior therapy techniques can be traced from exact experimental paradigms, a general guiding framework is provided by concepts and methodology derived from behavioral research and theories. In this paper, two concepts are discussed in relation to modern behavior therapy: (1) environmental-behavioral relationship and (2) response probability, with emphasis on the work of Tolman, Hull, Skinner and Brunswik. Current studies of "cognitive behavior therapy" are discussed with reference to methodology and techniques. All but one of the studies purporting to compare behavior therapy with cognitive behavior therapy actually mixed regular behavioral techniques with cognitive practices. All of the results can be explained on ordinary behavioral principles. Finally the behavioral basis of attitudes and perceptions is discussed in the light of work by Festinger, Bem, Taylor, Jacobson, Razran and others; and cognitive variables are found to fit very well within a purely behavioral framework. Our concepts and methodology need to be sharpened, rather than clouded, if behavior therapy is to make headway against the traditionalist bulwarks of the psychiatric community.
实验心理学为行为理论和实践贡献了许多实证概念和范式。虽然并非所有行为治疗技术都能追溯到确切的实验范式,但行为研究和理论衍生出的概念和方法提供了一个总体指导框架。在本文中,将结合现代行为治疗讨论两个概念:(1)环境与行为的关系,以及(2)反应概率,重点介绍托尔曼、赫尔、斯金纳和布伦斯维克的研究成果。将参考方法和技术来讨论当前对“认知行为治疗”的研究。所有声称比较行为治疗和认知行为治疗的研究中,除了一项研究外,实际上都将常规行为技术与认知方法混在一起。所有结果都可以用普通的行为原理来解释。最后,将根据费斯廷格、贝姆、泰勒、雅各布森、拉兹兰等人的研究成果来讨论态度和认知的行为基础;并且发现认知变量在纯粹的行为框架内非常契合。如果行为治疗要在精神病学界传统主义的堡垒面前取得进展,我们的概念和方法需要更加清晰,而不是变得模糊。