Berman L S, Downs J B, Van Eeden A, Delhagen D
Crit Care Med. 1981 Nov;9(11):775-7.
Mechanical ventilation with different ratios of inspiratory to expiratory times (I:E ratio) and levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) were applied to 9 dogs after the aspiration of fresh water and then were compared. The dogs were ventilated with an I:E ratio of 2:1 with 0 PEEP; an I:E ratio of 2:1 with 5 torr PEEP; and an I:E ratio of 1:2 with 5 torr PEEP. Peak airway pressures were regulated to maintain a mean airway pressure of 13 mm Hg. Arterial oxygenation was better with an I:E ratio of 1:2 with PEEP than with an I:E ratio of 2:1 either with or without PEEP (60 +/- 15 torr as compared with 42 +/- 11 torr and 43 +/- 10 torr). Cardiac index was depressed with all ventilatory modes, but oxygen delivery did not significantly differ among all the modes of ventilation. A ratio of prolonged I:E was not seen to benefit blood gas tension.
对9只吸入淡水后的犬应用不同吸气与呼气时间比(I:E比)及呼气末正压(PEEP)水平的机械通气,然后进行比较。犬分别以I:E比2:1且PEEP为0;I:E比2:1且PEEP为5托;I:E比1:2且PEEP为5托进行通气。调节气道峰值压力以维持平均气道压为13毫米汞柱。与I:E比为2:1且有或无PEEP相比,I:E比为1:2且有PEEP时动脉氧合更好(分别为60±15托与42±11托和43±10托)。所有通气模式下心脏指数均降低,但各通气模式间氧输送无显著差异。未发现延长的I:E比有利于血气张力。