Matuscak R R, Pasculle A W, Barnhart L, Atchison R W, Yee R B
J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Dec;12(6):761-3. doi: 10.1128/jcm.12.6.761-763.1980.
An immunofluorescent slide method incorporating 0.1% (wt/vol) Evans blue as a counterstain was developed and compared with a recently described tube method. Seventy-one urine specimens were tested concurrently by both methods. Results of the two methods agreed in 70 specimens and disagreed in only 1. We found the slide method to be less costly and time consuming than the tube method.
开发了一种免疫荧光玻片法,将0.1%(重量/体积)伊文思蓝用作复染剂,并与最近描述的试管法进行了比较。两种方法同时检测了71份尿液标本。两种方法的结果在70份标本中一致,仅在1份标本中不一致。我们发现玻片法比试管法成本更低且耗时更少。