Brockington I F, Kendell R E, Leff J P
Psychol Med. 1978 Aug;8(3):387-98. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700016068.
The study reports a comparison of 10 definitions of schizophrenia (Feighner's, Taylor's, Schneider's, Longfeldt's, Spitzer's, Carpenter's, Astrachan's, 2 from Forrest & Hay and Catego) in respect of their reliability, concordance and prediction of outcome. Some (including Feighner's) proved too strict, and others (including Schneider's) were weak predictors of clinical and social state. Four definitions (Spitzer's, Langfeldt's, Carpenter's and Catego) emerged as relatively effective and these also had a somewhat more satisfactory mutual concordance.
该研究报告了对精神分裂症的10种定义(费格纳氏、泰勒氏、施奈德氏、隆费尔特氏、斯皮策氏、卡彭特氏、阿斯特拉罕氏、福里斯特与海氏的2种定义以及分类法)在可靠性、一致性和预后预测方面的比较。一些定义(包括费格纳氏的)被证明过于严格,而其他定义(包括施奈德氏的)对临床和社会状况的预测能力较弱。四种定义(斯皮策氏、隆费尔特氏、卡彭特氏和分类法)表现出相对有效,并且它们之间的相互一致性也稍显更令人满意。