Wålinder O, Ronquist G, Fager P J
Clin Chem. 1982 Jan;28(1):96-9.
We compared a spectrophotometric kit method (Glycospec) for determination of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1) with a microcolumn kit method (Bio-Rad). The Glycospec method is based on the change in absorbance when phytic acid binds to hemoglobin A. With glycosylated hemoglobin there is no such change because the binding is blocked by the sugar moiety. Inter-assay CVs were 2-6% for both methods. In healthy subjects the mean (+/- SD) value for HbAl was about 1% higher with the spectrophotometric than the microcolumn method. For samples from 122 diabetics the correlation between values for HbAl obtained with the two methods was acceptable (r = 0.89), although the spectrophotometric technique yielded 2-4% higher values, a difference at least partly due to the absence of 2,3-diphosphoglycerate from the spectrophotometric standards. Adding 1.8 mmol of it per liter to these standards caused displacement of the standard curve; HbAl values then agreed well with those of the microcolumn method. The spectrophotometric procedure is easily automated, and therefore is well suited for large-scale analyses if problems with standards and calibration can be solved.
我们将一种用于测定糖化血红蛋白(HbA1)的分光光度试剂盒法(Glycospec)与一种微柱试剂盒法(Bio-Rad)进行了比较。Glycospec法基于植酸与血红蛋白A结合时吸光度的变化。对于糖化血红蛋白,由于糖基部分会阻止结合,所以不存在这种变化。两种方法的批间变异系数均为2% - 6%。在健康受试者中,分光光度法测得的HbA1平均(±标准差)值比微柱法约高1%。对于122名糖尿病患者的样本,两种方法测得的HbA1值之间的相关性良好(r = 0.89),尽管分光光度技术测得的值高2% - 4%,这种差异至少部分是由于分光光度标准品中没有2,3 - 二磷酸甘油酸。向这些标准品中每升添加1.8 mmol的2,3 - 二磷酸甘油酸会使标准曲线发生位移;此时HbA1值与微柱法测得的值吻合良好。分光光度法操作易于自动化,因此如果能解决标准品和校准方面的问题,就非常适合大规模分析。