Caplan M, Lubin B, Collins J F
J Clin Psychol. 1982 Jan;38(1):156-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198201)38:1<156::aid-jclp2270380125>3.0.co;2-v.
Explored response manipulation on the Depression Adjective Check List (DACL) in a 2 (trials) x 3 (instructions to fake) x 2 (sex) x 2 (order) mixed factorial, counterbalanced design in which 240 college students, 120 males and 120 females, were assigned randomly to one of six conditions with 20 males and 20 females per condition. For conditions 1, 2, and 3, each session consisted of two trials. In trial 1, Ss completed DACL, E, F, and G as they actually felt and in trial 2 they were instructed to either "fake good," "fake bad," or "fake average." The order of "actual" and "faked" trials was reversed for conditions 4, 5, and 6. The significant findings for "fake bad" and "fake good" were discussed in terms of the ability of an examiner to detect the manipulative set by means of the grossly deviant scores.
在一项2（试验次数）×3（伪装指令）×2（性别）×2（顺序）的混合因子、平衡设计中，对240名大学生（120名男性和120名女性）进行了《抑郁形容词检查表》（DACL）中的反应操纵研究。这些学生被随机分配到六种条件中的一种，每种条件下有20名男性和20名女性。对于条件1、2和3，每个阶段由两次试验组成。在试验1中，被试按照实际感受完成DACL、E、F和G；在试验2中，他们被指示要么“伪装良好”，要么“伪装糟糕”，要么“伪装一般”。对于条件4、5和6，“实际”和“伪装”试验的顺序相反。根据考官通过明显异常分数检测伪装意图的能力，讨论了“伪装糟糕”和“伪装良好”的显著发现。
