Lubin B, Nathan M M, Nathan R G
J Clin Psychol. 1981 Jan;37(1):172-5. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198101)37:1<172::aid-jclp2270370134>3.0.co;2-d.
Studied potential checking and response bias on the Depression Adjective Check Lists (DACL) by comparing the scores of 144 college students on three administration formats: True-false, forced-choice, and standard format. The DACL scores on the three formats were interrelated significantly with one another as well as with an independent measure of state depression of college students (CID). Correlations between the number of depressive adjectives checked and the depression score were significant in the true-false format, but not in the standard format. This argues against the use of the true-false format of the DACL. However, in demonstrating only a weak social desirability response bias, and in failing to reveal the existence of a checking bias, the results give further credence to the use of the standard format.
通过比较144名大学生在三种管理形式（正误形式、强制选择形式和标准形式）下在抑郁形容词检查表（DACL）上的得分，研究了潜在的检查和反应偏差。三种形式下的DACL得分彼此之间以及与大学生状态抑郁的独立测量指标（CID）显著相关。在正误形式中，勾选的抑郁形容词数量与抑郁得分之间的相关性显著，但在标准形式中不显著。这表明不赞成使用DACL的正误形式。然而，由于仅显示出较弱的社会期望反应偏差，且未揭示检查偏差的存在，研究结果进一步支持了标准形式的使用。
