Alderman D, Burke M, Cohen B, Di Marco A D, Fiet S, Hertzberg L, Sandor P
Vet Hum Toxicol. 1982 Feb;24(1):8-11.
A random survey of 1,019 household product labels was conducted by the NYPCC in retail markets in the New York metropolitan area. The purpose of this survey was to determine whether household product labels adequately define what a consumer should do in the event of a poisoning. The quality of poison warnings, first aid instructions, and the extent of ingredients listed were evaluated. In a qualitative and quantitative analysis of 1,019 household product labels it was found that 85% of the product labels had inadequate first aid information. Of these, 53% demonstrated insufficient labeling, 6% had incorrect, potentially harmful instructions, and in 26% of the cases instructions were absent entirely. In addition, 31% of these 1,019 products had no ingredients' list.U
纽约公共利益研究集团(NYPCC)在纽约大都会区的零售市场对1019个家用产品标签进行了随机调查。这项调查的目的是确定家用产品标签是否充分说明了消费者在中毒情况下应采取的措施。对中毒警告、急救说明以及列出的成分范围进行了评估。在对1019个家用产品标签进行的定性和定量分析中发现,85%的产品标签急救信息不足。其中,53%的标签标注不充分,6%有不正确的、可能有害的说明,26%的情况完全没有说明。此外,这1019种产品中有31%没有成分列表。