• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公众使用区域毒物控制中心对医疗保健成本的影响。

Health care cost effects of public use of a regional poison control center.

作者信息

Kearney T E, Olson K R, Bero L A, Heard S E, Blanc P D

机构信息

San Francisco Injury Center, San Francisco General Hospital, CA 94110, USA.

出版信息

West J Med. 1995 Jun;162(6):499-504.

PMID:7618308
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1022825/
Abstract

Poison control centers in the United States are threatened with closure, and attempts at a cost-benefit analysis of these services have been indeterminate. The purpose of this study was to compare the operating costs of a regional poison control center resulting from public use of its telephone hotline services with those of hypothetical alternative sources of advice and care. We conducted a follow-up telephone survey among 589 public callers to the San Francisco Bay Area Regional Poison Control Center who had been managed at home without medical referral after an unintentional poisoning. All survey respondents were asked what alternative action they would have taken had the poison control center not been available to assist them by telephone consultation. We then surveyed emergency departments and physicians' offices cited as alternatives by the callers to determine their response and charges for evaluating a suspected poisoning case. A total of 464 (79%) of the callers surveyed would have sought assistance from their local emergency health care system had the poison control center not been available. We conservatively estimated that the total charges for such evaluations would be +71,900. Comparatively, the total actual operating cost of services provided by the poison control center for all 589 poisoning cases was +13,547. Most of the study subjects (429 [73%]) had private insurance coverage. Direct public access to these services probably reduces the use of emergency health care resources, thus lowering health care costs.

摘要

美国的毒物控制中心面临关闭的威胁,而对这些服务进行成本效益分析的尝试尚无定论。本研究的目的是比较一个区域毒物控制中心因其电话热线服务被公众使用而产生的运营成本,与假设的替代咨询和护理来源的成本。我们对旧金山湾区区域毒物控制中心的589名公众来电者进行了后续电话调查,这些来电者在意外中毒后在家中接受处理,未被转诊至医疗机构。所有接受调查的受访者都被问及,如果毒物控制中心无法通过电话咨询为他们提供帮助,他们会采取什么替代行动。然后,我们对来电者提到的作为替代方案的急诊科和医生办公室进行了调查,以确定他们对评估疑似中毒病例的反应和收费情况。在接受调查的来电者中,共有464人(79%)表示,如果毒物控制中心无法提供帮助,他们会向当地的紧急医疗保健系统寻求帮助。我们保守估计,此类评估的总费用将为71,900美元。相比之下,毒物控制中心为所有589例中毒病例提供服务的实际总运营成本为13,547美元。大多数研究对象(429人[73%])拥有私人保险。公众直接使用这些服务可能会减少紧急医疗保健资源的使用,从而降低医疗保健成本。

相似文献

1
Health care cost effects of public use of a regional poison control center.公众使用区域毒物控制中心对医疗保健成本的影响。
West J Med. 1995 Jun;162(6):499-504.
2
Poison center funding--who should pay?毒物控制中心的资金——该由谁来支付?
J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1994;32(5):503-8. doi: 10.3109/15563659409011054.
3
The value of a poison control center in preventing unnecessary ED visits and hospital charges: A multi-year analysis.毒物控制中心在预防不必要的急诊就诊和医院费用方面的价值:一项多年分析。
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Mar;35(3):438-443. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.11.049. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
4
The costs and outcomes of restricting public access to poison control centers. Results from a natural experiment.限制公众获取中毒控制中心服务的成本与结果。一项自然实验的结果。
Med Care. 1998 Mar;36(3):271-80. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199803000-00005.
5
Accidental pediatric ingestion, hospital charges and failure to utilize a poison control center.儿童意外摄入、医院收费及未利用中毒控制中心的情况。
WMJ. 1999 Nov;98(7):29-33.
6
Emergency department poisoning visits in children younger than 6 years: comparing referrals by a regional poison control center to referrals by other sources.6岁以下儿童急诊科中毒就诊情况:比较地区中毒控制中心的转诊与其他来源的转诊。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Dec;28(12):1343-7. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318276c07a.
7
Establishment of a regional poison center.建立一个区域毒物中心。
Clin Toxicol. 1978 Dec;13(5):587-99. doi: 10.3109/15563657808988264.
8
Poison control centers: can their value be measured?
South Med J. 1991 Jun;84(6):722-6.
9
Poison control centers decrease emergency healthcare utilization costs.中毒控制中心可降低紧急医疗保健的使用成本。
J Med Toxicol. 2008 Dec;4(4):221-4. doi: 10.1007/BF03161204.
10
Cost-benefit analysis of a regional poison center.一个地区性毒物控制中心的成本效益分析。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2008 Jun;46(5):450-6. doi: 10.1080/15563650701616145.

引用本文的文献

1
Belgian Poison Centre impact on healthcare expenses of unintentional poisonings: a cost-benefit analysis.比利时中毒中心对非故意中毒医疗费用的影响:成本效益分析。
Int J Public Health. 2019 Dec;64(9):1283-1290. doi: 10.1007/s00038-019-01283-4. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
2
The Effect of a Medical Toxicology Inpatient Service in an Academic Tertiary Care Referral Center.医学毒理学住院服务对学术性三级转诊中心的影响。
J Med Toxicol. 2019 Jan;15(1):12-21. doi: 10.1007/s13181-018-0684-2. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
3
A survey of poison center knowledge and utilization among urban and rural residents of Arizona.亚利桑那州城乡居民中毒控制中心知识与利用情况调查。
Toxicol Rep. 2014 Dec 8;2:203-204. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2014.12.001. eCollection 2015.
4
A retrospective review of 911 calls to a regional poison control center.对一个地区毒物控制中心911个求助电话的回顾性研究。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2015 Oct-Dec;4(4):546-50. doi: 10.4103/2249-4863.174285.
5
Effect of a medical toxicology admitting service on length of stay, cost, and mortality among inpatients discharged with poisoning-related diagnoses.医学毒理学收治服务对中毒相关诊断出院的住院患者住院时间、费用和死亡率的影响。
J Med Toxicol. 2015 Mar;11(1):65-72. doi: 10.1007/s13181-014-0418-z.
6
Wartime toxicology: evaluation of a military medical toxicology telemedicine consults service to assist physicians serving overseas and in combat (2005-2012).战时毒理学:对一项军事医学毒理学远程医疗咨询服务的评估,该服务旨在协助海外及作战地区的医生(2005 - 2012年)。
J Med Toxicol. 2014 Sep;10(3):261-5. doi: 10.1007/s13181-014-0398-z.
7
A Survey of Primary Care Offices: Triage of Poisoning Calls without a Poison Control Center.初级保健办公室调查:无中毒控制中心情况下中毒呼叫的分诊
Int J Family Med. 2012;2012:417823. doi: 10.1155/2012/417823. Epub 2012 Jul 1.
8
Impact of a poison control center on the length of hospital stay of poisoned patients: retrospective cohort.毒物控制中心对中毒患者住院时间的影响:回顾性队列研究
Sao Paulo Med J. 2011 Jan 6;129(1):23-9. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802011000100005.
9
Comparison of incidence of hospital utilization for poisoning and other injury types.比较中毒和其他损伤类型的住院利用情况。
Public Health Rep. 2011 Jan-Feb;126(1):94-9. doi: 10.1177/003335491112600113.
10
The National Poison Center in Norway: user satisfaction and a health economic evaluation.挪威国家中毒控制中心:用户满意度与健康经济评估。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Sep;65(9):935-40. doi: 10.1007/s00228-009-0693-9. Epub 2009 Jul 10.

本文引用的文献

1
The emergency room and the changing pattern of medical care.急诊室与医疗护理模式的变化
N Engl J Med. 1958 Jan 2;258(1):20-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM195801022580105.
2
Primary care and public emergency department overcrowding.基层医疗与公共急诊科过度拥挤。
Am J Public Health. 1993 Mar;83(3):372-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.3.372.
3
How adequate are warnings and first and instructions on consumer product labels?: an investigation.消费品标签上的警告、首要注意事项及说明是否充分?一项调查。
Vet Hum Toxicol. 1982 Feb;24(1):8-11.
4
Effectiveness of a regional poison center in reducing excess emergency room visits for children's poisonings.地区中毒控制中心在减少儿童中毒急诊室就诊过量方面的有效性。
Pediatrics. 1983 Aug;72(2):164-9.
5
A regional poison control system. Effect on response to hypothetical poisonings.
Am J Dis Child. 1984 Nov;138(11):1010-3. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1984.02140490010002.
6
Fatal poisoning from salt used as an emetic.用作催吐剂的盐导致的致命中毒。
Am J Dis Child. 1973 Jun;125(6):889-90. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1973.04160060087020.
7
Cost saving from poison center use by medical consumers.
Vet Hum Toxicol. 1985 Dec;27(6):521.
8
American Association of Poison Control Centers. Certified regional poison control centers.
Vet Hum Toxicol. 1989 Aug;31(4):394-7.
9
An estimation of the annual incidence of poisoning using automated telephone polling.
J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1990;28(2):193-202. doi: 10.3109/15563659008993492.
10
Poison control centers: can their value be measured?
South Med J. 1991 Jun;84(6):722-6.