Koenig J Q, Pierson W E, Horike M, Frank R
Arch Environ Health. 1982 Jan-Feb;37(1):5-9. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1982.10667525.
Recently we reported statistically significant changes in pulmonary functional measurements in asthmatic adolescents exposed at rest or during exercise. To demonstrate whether those results were due to the subjects' adolescence, or more likely, to their diagnosis of asthma, we repeated identical exposures in healthy adolescents. The changes after exposure to sulfur dioxide (SO2); however the changes were only slightly greater than those seen after sham exposure. After exposure at rest to 1.0 ppm SO2 + 1 mg/m3 sodium chloride (NaCl) droplet aerosol, the healthy adolescents showed small (3%) but statistically significant reductions in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1.0). No significant changes were seen following exposure to NaCl of SO2 alone at rest. Exposure to the SO2 modes during moderate exercise produced greater changes. Following exposure to either the SO2 + NaCl mixture or 1.0 ppm of SO2 alone, the reductions in FEV1.0 were slightly greater (6%) and prolonged compared with those seen at rest. Significant decreases also were seen in Vmax50 and Vmax75. A small decrease (4%) in FEV1.0 was seen following exposure to NaCl alone during exercise, but the change was not statistically significant. The changes seen in the healthy adolescents were slight compared to those seen in the asthmatic adolescents previously exposed (changes of 23-67%). We conclude that asthmatic adolescents are much more sensitive to the effects of inhaled SO2 than are healthy adolescents.
最近我们报告称,在休息或运动时接触过相关物质的哮喘青少年的肺功能测量值出现了具有统计学意义的变化。为了证明这些结果是由于受试者处于青春期,还是更有可能是由于他们被诊断为哮喘,我们在健康青少年中重复了相同的接触实验。接触二氧化硫(SO₂)后会出现变化;然而,这些变化仅略大于假接触后观察到的变化。在休息时接触1.0 ppm SO₂ + 1 mg/m³氯化钠(NaCl)液滴气雾剂后,健康青少年的一秒用力呼气量(FEV₁.₀)出现了小幅度(3%)但具有统计学意义的下降。在休息时单独接触NaCl或SO₂后未观察到显著变化。在中度运动期间接触SO₂模式会产生更大的变化。接触SO₂ + NaCl混合物或仅1.0 ppm SO₂后,FEV₁.₀的下降幅度略大(6%),且与休息时相比持续时间更长。Vmax50和Vmax75也出现了显著下降。在运动期间单独接触NaCl后,FEV₁.₀出现了小幅度(4%)下降,但该变化无统计学意义。与之前接触过的哮喘青少年相比,健康青少年中观察到的变化较小(变化幅度为23 - 67%)。我们得出结论,哮喘青少年比健康青少年对吸入SO₂的影响更为敏感。