• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Acceptance of new criteria for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and related conditions by the Canadian Diabetes Association.加拿大糖尿病协会对糖尿病及相关病症诊断新标准的认可。
Can Med Assoc J. 1982 Mar 1;126(5):473-6.
2
[New diagnostic criteria and classification of diabetes mellitus].[糖尿病新的诊断标准与分类]
Lijec Vjesn. 2000 May-Jun;122(5-6):99-102.
3
[Impaired glucose tolerance--current concept and its classification].
Nihon Rinsho. 1996 Oct;54(10):2629-35.
4
[What are the consequences of the new American guidelines for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus in The Netherlands?].[美国糖尿病诊断新指南对荷兰有何影响?]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1998 Jan 31;142(5):222-5.
5
Current diagnostic criteria and their impact on outcome and management.当前的诊断标准及其对治疗结果和管理的影响。
J Indian Med Assoc. 2002 Mar;100(3):149-52.
6
New classification and criteria for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. The Australasian Working Party on Diagnostic Criteria for Diabetes Mellitus.糖尿病诊断的新分类与标准。澳大利亚糖尿病诊断标准工作小组。
N Z Med J. 1999 Apr 23;112(1086):139-41.
7
Comparison of The World Health Organization (WHO) two-step strategy and OGTT for diabetes mellitus screening.世界卫生组织(WHO)两步法策略与口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)用于糖尿病筛查的比较。
Acta Med Indones. 2004 Jan-Mar;36(1):3-7.
8
Gestational diabetes: implications of variation in post-partum follow-up criteria.妊娠期糖尿病:产后随访标准差异的影响
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004 Apr 15;113(2):149-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2003.09.021.
9
Epidemiological considerations related to the new diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus. The European Diabetes Epidemiology Group (EDEG).与糖尿病新诊断标准相关的流行病学考量。欧洲糖尿病流行病学小组(EDEG)。
Diabetologia. 1998 Nov;41(11):51-2.
10
[Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus: the WHO recommendation vs the National Diabetes Data Group criteria].
Rev Med Chil. 1986 Jun;114(6):534-40.

引用本文的文献

1
Multidisciplinary survey of erectile impotence.勃起功能障碍的多学科调查。
Can Med Assoc J. 1983 Jun 15;128(12):1393-9.

本文引用的文献

1
CRITERIA FOR THE ORAL GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST IN PREGNANCY.孕期口服葡萄糖耐量试验标准
Diabetes. 1964 May-Jun;13:278-85.
2
Normalization effect of preceding protein meals on "diabetic" oral glucose tolerance in Eskimos.先前蛋白质餐对爱斯基摩人“糖尿病性”口服葡萄糖耐量的正常化作用。
Can Med Assoc J. 1972 Oct 21;107(8):733-8.

加拿大糖尿病协会对糖尿病及相关病症诊断新标准的认可。

Acceptance of new criteria for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and related conditions by the Canadian Diabetes Association.

出版信息

Can Med Assoc J. 1982 Mar 1;126(5):473-6.

PMID:7066803
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1863061/
Abstract

The National Diabetes Data Group (NDDG) of the National Institutes of Health in the United States has recently issued a report setting guidelines for the classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and other forms of glucose intolerance. The report, intended to provide a uniform basis from which clinical and epidemiologic studies could be planned, and to serve as a guide for clinicians, is committed to the concept of avoiding overdiagnosis of diabetes and consequently expands the proportion of patients classified as having impaired glucose tolerance. The clinical and scientific section of the Canadian Diabetes Association has accepted the report in principle, anticipating that it may need to be modified in the light of future clinical experience and research findings. It is recommended that the NDDG and the expert committee of the World Health Organization be informed of this position and that the Canadian Diabetes Association offer to contribute to what will likely be periodic revision of the classification.

摘要

美国国立卫生研究院的国家糖尿病数据组(NDDG)最近发布了一份报告,为糖尿病及其他形式的葡萄糖耐量异常制定分类和诊断指南。该报告旨在为临床和流行病学研究规划提供统一依据,并作为临床医生的指导,致力于避免糖尿病的过度诊断这一理念,因此扩大了被归类为葡萄糖耐量受损患者的比例。加拿大糖尿病协会的临床与科学部门原则上接受了该报告,预计可能需要根据未来的临床经验和研究结果进行修改。建议将这一立场告知NDDG和世界卫生组织专家委员会,并且加拿大糖尿病协会主动提出为可能的分类定期修订做出贡献。