• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种自动血压记录仪与汞柱式血压计的比较。

Comparison of two automatic blood pressure recorders and the mercury sphygomomanometer.

作者信息

Voors A W, Sklov M C, Halperin H, Webber L S, Berenson G S

出版信息

Hypertension. 1982 Mar-Apr;4(2):329-36. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.4.2.329.

DOI:10.1161/01.hyp.4.2.329
PMID:7068191
Abstract

The Physiometrics automatic blood pressure recorder was compared with the mercury sphygmomanometer in 2200 children aged 5-14 years, each reexamined after 3 and 5 years; the Physiometrics recorder produced higher intrachild correlations. In trials we could transfer what were essentially Physiometrics readings into levels similar to mercury sphygmomanometric readings by filtering out the infrasonic frequency band. The Physiometrics USM-105 was compared with its successor, the Physiometrics SR-2, on 378 children aged 10-17 years. The SR-2 measured lower than the USM-105: 4.1 mm Hg systolic and 8.5 mm Hg diastolic; differences were larger in the younger children. Both in mean levels and correlations, SR-2 readings were closer to the mercury sphygmomanometer's than were USM-105 readings, except or diastolic SR-2 readings, which were farther below the mercury sphygomomanometer 4th-phase readings than the USM-105. However, the SR-2 readings are likely closer to the true diastolic pressure in children 13 years and older, although we did not measure pressures intraarterially. Disc readings for systolic pressures showed coefficients of correlation averaging 0.96 among (n = 168) and 0.98 within (n = 40) readers for both models, but diastolic readings showed marked improvement form USM-105 (0.73, 0.81) to SR-2 (0.91, 0.97). In many of the parameters observed, SR-2 constitutes an improvement over USM-105. Automatic recorders offer certain advantages for measuring blood pressure in large-scale epidemiologic studies.

摘要

对2200名5至14岁儿童使用体动测量法自动血压记录仪与汞柱式血压计进行比较,每位儿童在3年和5年后再次接受检查;体动测量法记录仪在儿童个体内部产生了更高的相关性。在试验中,我们通过滤除次声频段,能够将本质上是体动测量法的读数转换为与汞柱式血压计读数相似的水平。对378名10至17岁儿童使用体动测量法USM - 105及其后续型号SR - 2进行比较。SR - 2测量值低于USM - 105:收缩压低4.1毫米汞柱,舒张压低8.5毫米汞柱;在年龄较小的儿童中差异更大。无论是平均水平还是相关性方面,SR - 2的读数都比USM - 105的读数更接近汞柱式血压计的读数,但SR - 2的舒张压读数除外,其比汞柱式血压计第四阶段读数低得更多,比USM - 105的更低。然而,尽管我们没有进行动脉内压力测量,但SR - 2的读数可能更接近13岁及以上儿童的真实舒张压。两种型号收缩压的碟片读数显示,在(n = 168)不同读者之间平均相关系数为0.96,在(n = 40)同一读者内部为0.98,但舒张压读数从USM - 105(0.73,0.81)到SR - 2(0.91,0.97)有显著改善。在观察到的许多参数中,SR - 2相对于USM - 105有改进。自动记录仪在大规模流行病学研究中测量血压具有一定优势。

相似文献

1
Comparison of two automatic blood pressure recorders and the mercury sphygomomanometer.两种自动血压记录仪与汞柱式血压计的比较。
Hypertension. 1982 Mar-Apr;4(2):329-36. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.4.2.329.
2
[Are automatic devices suitable for blood pressure determinations?].[自动设备适用于血压测定吗?]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1979 Sep 1;109(33):1225-30.
3
Comparisons of blood pressure measurements by auscultation and Physiometrics Infrasonde recording techniques.通过听诊法和物理测量次声记录技术进行血压测量的比较。
Hypertension. 1980 Jul-Aug;2(4 Pt 2):I8-17. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.2.4_pt_2.i8.
4
Concurrent validity studies of blood pressure instrumentation. The Philadelphia Blood Pressure Project.血压测量仪器的同时效度研究。费城血压项目。
Hypertension. 1984 Jan-Feb;6(1):85-91. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.6.1.85.
5
A comparison of the Sphygmetrics SR-2 Automatic Blood Pressure Recorder to the mercury sphygmomanometer in population studies.在人群研究中,将Sphygmetrics SR-2自动血压记录仪与汞柱式血压计进行比较。
Am J Epidemiol. 1981 Dec;114(6):836-44. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113254.
6
Failure of the community-based Vita-Stat automated blood pressure device to accurately measure blood pressure.基于社区的Vita-Stat自动血压测量设备未能准确测量血压。
Arch Fam Med. 1995 May;4(5):419-24. doi: 10.1001/archfami.4.5.419.
7
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring during pregnancy. Comparison with mercury sphygmomanometry.孕期动态血压监测。与汞柱式血压计的比较。
Am J Hypertens. 1993 Sep;6(9):745-9. doi: 10.1093/ajh/6.9.745.
8
Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010.比较自动振荡式血压计和汞柱式血压计的血压随机方法学研究:2009 - 2010年美国国家健康与营养检查调查
Natl Health Stat Report. 2012 Oct 5(59):1-15.
9
Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.三种示波法血压测量设备在儿童中相对于听诊法汞柱血压计的验证。
Blood Press Monit. 2006 Oct;11(5):281-91. doi: 10.1097/01.mbp.0000209082.09623.b4.
10
Blood pressure monitoring with home monitors versus mercury sphygmomanometer.使用家用血压监测仪与水银血压计进行血压监测。
Ann Pharmacother. 2001 Jul-Aug;35(7-8):817-22. doi: 10.1345/aph.10270.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of oscillometric devices for the measurement of blood pressure-comparison with the gold standard.使用振荡测量设备测量血压——与金标准的比较。
Indian J Pediatr. 2012 Sep;79(9):1230-2. doi: 10.1007/s12098-011-0600-0. Epub 2011 Nov 5.