• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用振荡测量设备测量血压——与金标准的比较。

Use of oscillometric devices for the measurement of blood pressure-comparison with the gold standard.

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, St. John's Medical College, Sarjapur Road, Bangalore, 560034, India.

出版信息

Indian J Pediatr. 2012 Sep;79(9):1230-2. doi: 10.1007/s12098-011-0600-0. Epub 2011 Nov 5.

DOI:10.1007/s12098-011-0600-0
PMID:22057397
Abstract

The study was done to validate the use of automated devices (Datascope Duo) as a screening tool for measuring blood pressure. A cross sectional study was conducted in school children from urban slums of Bangalore. Blood pressure was recorded according to standard guidelines using a mercury sphygmomanometer and an automated device (Datascope Duo). The readings obtained using the two instruments were compared. One thousand four hundred eighty nine school children, both males and females, aged 5-16 y were included in the study. Readings with the Datascope Duo varied significantly when compared to the gold standard. The blood pressure measurements using Datascope Duo cannot be recommended as an accurate substitute for manual readings.

摘要

本研究旨在验证自动化设备(Datascope Duo)作为血压筛查工具的使用。在班加罗尔市区贫民窟的学童中进行了一项横断面研究。使用汞柱血压计和自动化设备(Datascope Duo)按照标准指南记录血压。比较两种仪器获得的读数。研究纳入了 1489 名男童和女童,年龄为 5-16 岁。与金标准相比,Datascope Duo 的读数差异显著。因此,不建议使用 Datascope Duo 进行血压测量,因其不能准确替代手动读数。

相似文献

1
Use of oscillometric devices for the measurement of blood pressure-comparison with the gold standard.使用振荡测量设备测量血压——与金标准的比较。
Indian J Pediatr. 2012 Sep;79(9):1230-2. doi: 10.1007/s12098-011-0600-0. Epub 2011 Nov 5.
2
Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.三种示波法血压测量设备在儿童中相对于听诊法汞柱血压计的验证。
Blood Press Monit. 2006 Oct;11(5):281-91. doi: 10.1097/01.mbp.0000209082.09623.b4.
3
Disagreement of the two oscillometric blood pressure measurement devices, Datascope Accutorr Plus and Omron HEM-705CP II, and bidirectional conversion of blood pressure values.Datascope Accutorr Plus和欧姆龙HEM-705CP II这两种示波法血压测量设备之间的差异以及血压值的双向转换。
Blood Press Monit. 2014 Apr;19(2):109-17. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000037.
4
Performance of oscillometric blood pressure devices in children in resource-poor settings.振荡式血压测量设备在资源匮乏地区儿童中的性能表现。
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2008 Jun;15(3):362-4. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e3282f738b8.
5
Can an automatic oscillometric device replace a mercury sphygmomanometer on blood pressure measurement? a systematic review and meta-analysis.自动振荡式血压计能否替代汞柱式血压计进行血压测量?一项系统评价与Meta分析。
Blood Press Monit. 2019 Dec;24(6):265-276. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000412.
6
Comparison of two blood pressure oscillometric devices: Datascope Accutorr Plus and Mobil-O-Graph PWA and conversion of blood pressure values from one device to the other.两种示波法血压测量设备的比较:Datascope Accutorr Plus和Mobil-O-Graph PWA以及血压值在两种设备之间的转换
Blood Press Monit. 2020 Feb;25(1):42-49. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000409.
7
Accuracy of oscillometric devices in children and adults.示波测量设备在儿童和成人中的准确性。
Blood Press. 2010 Aug;19(4):254-9. doi: 10.3109/08037051003606439.
8
Validation of A&D UA-778 blood pressure monitor in children.A&D UA-778型儿童血压监测仪的验证
Blood Press Monit. 2009 Oct;14(5):228-31. doi: 10.1097/mbp.0b013e328330eeb2.
9
Comparison of auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressures.听诊法与示波法血压测量结果的比较。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001 Jan;155(1):50-3. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.155.1.50.
10
Comparison of blood pressure measurements between an automated oscillometric device and a Hawksley random-zero sphygmomanometer in the northern Sweden MONICA study.瑞典北部MONICA研究中自动示波装置与Hawksley随机零点血压计之间血压测量的比较。
Blood Press Monit. 2012 Aug;17(4):164-70. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e328356ef58.

引用本文的文献

1
Pediatric Hypertension: A Condition That Matters.小儿高血压:一个值得关注的病症。
Children (Basel). 2024 Apr 26;11(5):518. doi: 10.3390/children11050518.

本文引用的文献

1
The fourth report on the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年高血压的诊断、评估与治疗第四次报告
Pediatrics. 2004 Aug;114(2 Suppl 4th Report):555-76.
2
Are pitfalls of oxcillometric blood pressure measurements preventable in children?示波法测量儿童血压的陷阱是否可以预防?
Pediatr Nephrol. 2003 Apr;18(4):313-8. doi: 10.1007/s00467-003-1075-7.
3
Blood pressure measuring devices: recommendations of the European Society of Hypertension.血压测量设备:欧洲高血压学会的建议
BMJ. 2001 Mar 3;322(7285):531-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7285.531.
4
Comparison of auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressures.听诊法与示波法血压测量结果的比较。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001 Jan;155(1):50-3. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.155.1.50.
5
Identifying children at high risk for the development of essential hypertension.识别有患原发性高血压高风险的儿童。
J Pediatr. 1993 Jun;122(6):837-46. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(09)90005-1.
6
Blood pressure measurement in childhood epidemiological studies.儿童流行病学研究中的血压测量
Circulation. 1995 Aug 15;92(4):1049-57. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.92.4.1049.
7
Comparison of two automatic blood pressure recorders and the mercury sphygomomanometer.两种自动血压记录仪与汞柱式血压计的比较。
Hypertension. 1982 Mar-Apr;4(2):329-36. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.4.2.329.
8
Differences in blood pressure levels obtained by auscultatory and oscillometric methods.通过听诊法和示波法测得的血压水平差异。
Am J Dis Child. 1990 Aug;144(8):911-4. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1990.02150320075031.