• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区医院参与临床试验:东部肿瘤协作组五年经验分析

Participation of community hospitals in clinical trials: analysis of five years of experience in the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

作者信息

Begg C B, Carbone P P, Elson P J, Zelen M

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1982 May 6;306(18):1076-80. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198205063061803.

DOI:10.1056/NEJM198205063061803
PMID:7070403
Abstract

The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) initiated a program in 1976 to involve community hospitals in multi-institutional clinical trials. The community hospitals can be characterized as generally having no tradition of participating in clinical trials of cancer therapy, whereas the ECOG member institutions are university hospitals or major treatment centers. More than 100 community hospitals participated in 97 randomized trials involving 4506 patients from November 1976 through February 1981. Comparisons between the community hospitals and the ECOG member institutions indicate that the quality of participation was similar, as measured by rates of ineligibility, compliance with the protocol, and submission of data. Objective measures of outcome, such as survival, response, and toxicity, were also comparable. We conclude that under the mechanism adopted by the ECOG, it is possible to include community hospitals in clinical trials of cancer therapy without reducing the quality of the data or compromising the therapeutic outcomes.

摘要

东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)于1976年启动了一项计划,让社区医院参与多机构临床试验。社区医院的特点通常是没有参与癌症治疗临床试验的传统,而ECOG成员机构则是大学医院或主要治疗中心。从1976年11月到1981年2月,超过100家社区医院参与了97项随机试验,涉及4506名患者。社区医院与ECOG成员机构之间的比较表明,通过不合格率、方案依从性和数据提交率来衡量,参与质量相似。生存、反应和毒性等客观结局指标也具有可比性。我们得出结论,在ECOG采用的机制下,有可能将社区医院纳入癌症治疗临床试验,而不会降低数据质量或影响治疗效果。

相似文献

1
Participation of community hospitals in clinical trials: analysis of five years of experience in the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.社区医院参与临床试验:东部肿瘤协作组五年经验分析
N Engl J Med. 1982 May 6;306(18):1076-80. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198205063061803.
2
Cancer clinical trials in the USA: patient eligibility, generalizability of results and technology transfer.美国的癌症临床试验:患者资格、结果的可推广性及技术转让
Bull Cancer. 1987;74(2):197-203.
3
The participation of community hospitals in cancer clinical trials: results and impact of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Program.社区医院参与癌症临床试验:东部肿瘤协作组项目的结果与影响
Prog Clin Biol Res. 1983;120:295-7.
4
Organizations and structures that facilitate community research.促进社区研究的组织和结构。
Semin Oncol. 1994 Aug;21(4 Suppl 7):107-11.
5
Long-term survival in acute myeloid leukemia: the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group experience.
Cancer. 1997 Dec 1;80(11 Suppl):2205-9.
6
The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.美国国家癌症研究所全爱尔兰癌症会议。
Oncologist. 1999;4(4):275-277.
7
Increasing minority participation in cancer clinical trials: the minority-based community clinical oncology program experience.提高少数族裔参与癌症临床试验的比例:基于少数族裔的社区临床肿瘤学项目经验。
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 1;23(22):5247-54. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.22.236.
8
Performance in quasi-firms: an example from the Community Clinical Oncology Program.准企业中的表现:以社区临床肿瘤项目为例。
J Health Hum Resour Adm. 1992 Winter;14(3):307-26.
9
Head and neck cancer care at a community-based teaching hospital.社区教学医院的头颈癌护理
Head Neck. 2005 Jul;27(7):613-5. doi: 10.1002/hed.20194.
10
Adapting clinical trials networks to promote cancer prevention and control research.调整临床试验网络以促进癌症预防与控制研究。
Cancer. 2006 Jan 1;106(1):180-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21548.

引用本文的文献

1
The research activities of Ontario's large community hospitals: an updated scoping review.安大略省大型社区医院的研究活动:更新的范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):1137. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11454-6.
2
Clinical trial performance of community- vs university-based practices in the submacular surgery trials (SST): SST report no. 2.黄斑下手术试验(SST)中社区医疗实践与大学医疗实践的临床试验表现:SST报告第2号。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2004 Jun;122(6):857-63. doi: 10.1001/archopht.122.6.857.
3
Attitude of African-Americans regarding prostate cancer clinical trials.
非裔美国人对前列腺癌临床试验的态度。
J Community Health. 1996 Apr;21(2):77-87. doi: 10.1007/BF01682300.
4
Centralised treatment, entry to trials and survival.集中治疗、进入试验与生存情况。
Br J Cancer. 1994 Aug;70(2):352-62. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1994.306.
5
MRC quality of life studies using a daily diary card--practical lessons learned from cancer trials.使用每日日记卡的医学研究委员会生活质量研究——癌症试验中的实践经验教训。
Qual Life Res. 1995 Aug;4(4):343-52. doi: 10.1007/BF01593887.
6
Who treats cancer?谁治疗癌症?
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1987 Jan;21(1):61-6.