Suppr超能文献

上气道异物梗阻的治疗。

Treatment of foreign body obstruction of the upper airway.

作者信息

Hoffman J R

出版信息

West J Med. 1982 Jan;136(1):11-22.

Abstract

The treatment of foreign body obstruction of the upper airway has been the subject of considerable attention and controversy. Current recommendations from the National Academy of Sciences, the American Red Cross and the American Heart Association include the use of back blows, abdominal thrusts (Heimlich maneuver) or chest thrusts (or both) and finger probes, until definitive therapy by trained medical and paramedical personnel becomes available. Nevertheless, a number of authorities on this subject have claimed that these approaches are dangerous, and that abdominal thrusts should be the first and only first-aid technique used in this situation. There are only limited data on which to make recommendations regarding this issue. Clinical evidence is scanty and of a highly anecdotal and unscientific nature. The data that are available suggest that a combination of maneuvers is in fact preferable to any single maneuver. Experimental physiologic data on both humans and animals tend to support this concept and suggest that back blows, which generate high initial pressures, may dislodge objects from the larynx enough to allow subsequent thrust maneuvers, which generate more sustained increases in intrathoracic pressure, to move the object out of the larynx. At this time, in the absence of definitive data, it seems reasonable to teach as many lay citizens as possible to recognize upper airway obstruction due to foreign body and to perform any and all of these techniques (preferably in combination), as well as external cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) where appropriate, on choking victims.

摘要

上气道异物梗阻的治疗一直备受关注且存在争议。美国国家科学院、美国红十字会和美国心脏协会目前的建议包括使用背部叩击、腹部冲击法(海姆立克急救法)或胸部冲击法(或两者并用)以及手指探查,直到训练有素的医疗和医护人员进行确定性治疗。然而,一些该领域的权威人士声称这些方法很危险,并且在这种情况下腹部冲击法应该是首要且唯一的急救技术。关于这个问题,可供参考的数据有限。临床证据匮乏,且多为传闻轶事,不具科学性。现有数据表明,多种手法联合使用实际上比单一手法更可取。关于人类和动物的实验生理数据倾向于支持这一观点,并表明能产生较高初始压力的背部叩击可能会将异物从喉部排出,使后续能产生更持续胸内压升高的冲击手法将异物从喉部排出。目前,由于缺乏确凿数据,让尽可能多的普通民众学会识别因异物导致的上气道梗阻,并对窒息受害者实施这些技术中的任何一种或全部(最好联合使用)以及在适当情况下进行体外心肺复苏术似乎是合理的。

相似文献

9
The treatment of food-choking.
Practitioner. 1978 Nov;221(1325):725-9.
10
Sausage asphyxia.
Int J Clin Pract. 2001 Dec;55(10):723-4.

本文引用的文献

1
THE CAF'E CORONARY. SUDDEN DEATHS IN RESTAURANTS.
JAMA. 1963 Oct 12;186:142-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.1963.63710020011017.
2
Four-minute limit for cardiac resuscitation.心脏复苏的四分钟时限。
J Am Med Assoc. 1956 Aug 11;161(15):1454-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.1956.02970150022005.
3
Food asphyxiation--restaurant rescue.食物窒息——餐厅救援。
N Engl J Med. 1973 Jul 12;289(2):81-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197307122890206.
4
Evaluation of a cardiopulmonary resuscitation course for secondary schools.
Med Care. 1975 Sep;13(9):763-74. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197509000-00006.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验