Baess I, Magnusson M
Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B. 1982 Apr;90(2):101-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1982.tb00089.x.
This study is a contribution to the elucidation of the taxonomic relationships among Mycobacterium simiae serovars 1 and 2, other photochromogenic, mycobacterial species and the non-photochromogenic species M. avium and M. intracellulare. DNA-DNA homology percentages and comparative reciprocal intradermal sensitin reactions in guinea-pigs have confirmed that M. habana is a subjective synonym of M. simiae serovar 1 and that M. asiaticum is a separate species. The two strains of M. simiae serovar 2 studied were distinct from each other and both were distinct from M. simiae serovar 1. M. simiae was so different from M. avium and even from M. intracellulare serovars 12, 14, 16 and 19, that there is no basis for including M. simiae in the so-called M. avium-intracellulare complex. Neither did M. simiae bear any close relation to the photochromogenic species M. kansasii and M. marinum. A fairly close negative correlation was observed between the DNA-DNA homology percentages and the specificity differences of the sensitins from the same pairs of strains. This is per se a proof of the veracity of the two taxonomic methods used in the study.
本研究有助于阐明猿猴分枝杆菌血清型1和2、其他光产色分枝杆菌种以及非光产色菌种鸟分枝杆菌和胞内分枝杆菌之间的分类关系。DNA - DNA同源性百分比以及豚鼠体内的比较性双向皮内致敏反应证实,哈瓦那分枝杆菌是猿猴分枝杆菌血清型1的主观同物异名,而亚洲分枝杆菌是一个独立的菌种。所研究的两株猿猴分枝杆菌血清型2彼此不同,且均与猿猴分枝杆菌血清型1不同。猿猴分枝杆菌与鸟分枝杆菌甚至与胞内分枝杆菌血清型12、14、16和19差异极大,因此没有依据将猿猴分枝杆菌归入所谓的鸟分枝杆菌 - 胞内分枝杆菌复合群。猿猴分枝杆菌与光产色菌种堪萨斯分枝杆菌和海分枝杆菌也没有任何密切关系。在同一对菌株的DNA - DNA同源性百分比与致敏素的特异性差异之间观察到相当紧密的负相关。这本身就证明了本研究中所使用的两种分类方法的准确性。