Suppr超能文献

反对常规手术胆管造影的理由。

The case against routine operative cholangiography.

作者信息

Gerber A, Apt M K

出版信息

Am J Surg. 1982 Jun;143(6):734-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(82)90048-4.

Abstract

We reviewed 500 consecutive cholecystectomies during which operative cholangiography was performed only when there were clinical indications for common duct exploration. Negative operative cholangiograms obviated the necessity for exploration in a substantial number of cases. Cholecystectomy without operative cholangiography was performed in 438 patients. From the average experience of those employing routine cholangiography (6 percent incidence of unsuspected stones), we presumably missed common duct stones in about 26 patients, but those stones either passed spontaneously or caused no problems. A single patient requiring reoperation for a retained stone was not a candidate for cholangiography at the original operation. No common duct injuries occurred in the series. We conclude that routine operative cholangiography is unnecessary for either finding unsuspected common duct stones or detecting ductal anomalies.

摘要

我们回顾了连续500例胆囊切除术,其中仅在有胆总管探查临床指征时才进行术中胆管造影。大量病例中,阴性术中胆管造影结果避免了探查的必要性。438例患者未进行术中胆管造影直接行胆囊切除术。根据那些采用常规胆管造影者的平均经验(未被怀疑的结石发生率为6%),我们推测大约有26例患者漏诊了胆总管结石,但这些结石要么自行排出,要么未引发问题。1例因残留结石需再次手术的患者在初次手术时并非胆管造影的适应证。该系列中未发生胆总管损伤。我们得出结论,常规术中胆管造影对于发现未被怀疑的胆总管结石或检测胆管异常均无必要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验