Tyagi N S, Meredith M C, Lumb J C, Cacdac R G, Vanterpool C C, Rayls K R, Zerega W D, Silbergleit A
St. Joseph Mercy Hospital, Pontiac, Michigan.
Ann Surg. 1994 Nov;220(5):617-25. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199411000-00004.
The authors devised a minimally invasive technique for cholecystectomy via microceliotomy that provides safety attainable with the open conventional approach and postoperative results comparable to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has evolved as a minimally invasive outpatient procedure. Patients can return rapidly to preoperative status with minimal postoperative morbidity and pain, and the small scar size is cosmetically desirable. Unfortunately, there are reports of serious intraoperative complications, including injury to blood vessels, bowel, and the bile ducts, caused by failure to identify structures properly. The conventional cholecystectomy technique currently is relegated to patients on whom the laparoscopic procedure cannot be performed.
Cholecystectomy was performed through a 3-cm transverse high subxiphoid incision in the "minimal stress triangle." The location, anterior to Calot's triangle, was critical in providing a direct vertical view of the biliary ducts during dissection. Direct view cholecystectomy was performed using endoscopic instruments without pneumoperitoneum. Postoperative data were compared with both laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy results.
Using the microceliotomy technique in the ambulatory setting, cholecystectomy was performed successfully in 99.3% (N = 143) of cases. Biliary leakage beyond the third postoperative day was caused by failure of clips or obstruction to bile flow. The postoperative morbidity, acceptability of scar, and analgesic requirements compare favorably with other techniques. Microceliotomy is cost effective. Portal hypertension is a contraindication for this procedure.
The microceliotomy approach offers a viable, safe, and cost-effective alternative to the laparoscopic technique for cholecystectomy, especially when facilities for laparoscopy are not available or when the laparoscopic procedure cannot be performed.
作者设计了一种通过微剖腹术进行胆囊切除术的微创技术,该技术能提供与传统开放手术相当的安全性,且术后效果与腹腔镜胆囊切除术相当。
腹腔镜胆囊切除术已发展成为一种微创门诊手术。患者术后恢复快,发病率和疼痛轻微,能迅速恢复到术前状态,且小疤痕在美观上更受欢迎。不幸的是,有报道称由于未能正确识别组织结构,术中出现了严重并发症,包括血管、肠道和胆管损伤。目前,传统胆囊切除术技术仅适用于无法进行腹腔镜手术的患者。
在“最小应激三角区”通过一个3厘米的横向高位剑突下切口进行胆囊切除术。该位置位于胆囊三角前方,在解剖过程中对于直接垂直观察胆管至关重要。使用内镜器械在无气腹的情况下进行直视下胆囊切除术。将术后数据与腹腔镜和开放胆囊切除术的结果进行比较。
在门诊环境中使用微剖腹术技术,99.3%(N = 143)的病例成功完成了胆囊切除术。术后第三天以后的胆漏是由夹子失效或胆汁流动受阻引起的。术后发病率、疤痕可接受性和镇痛需求均优于其他技术。微剖腹术具有成本效益。门静脉高压是该手术的禁忌证。
微剖腹术为胆囊切除术提供了一种可行、安全且具有成本效益的替代腹腔镜技术的方法,特别是在没有腹腔镜设备或无法进行腹腔镜手术的情况下。