Stallones R A
Ann Intern Med. 1982 Jun;96(6 Pt 2):917-20. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-96-6-917.
In response to case reports of toxic shock syndrome, six case-comparison studies were done in 1980. Early cases were predominantly in menstruating women, and the use of tampons was strongly associated with the onset of illness. Because of the widespread publication of this finding, the case-comparison studies had problems due to differential ascertainment and recall bias. However, the number of cases among women was so great and the relation with tampon use so marked that unreasonable assumptions are necessary if the results are to be attributed to these biases. The studies show the power of epidemiologic methods, even given the unfavorable circumstance of an uncommon condition, associated with a common practice. Although the absolute risk of toxic shock syndrome is small, tampon users have more than a tenfold excess risk of the condition over women not using tampons, and the use of tampons is an adequate explanation for the excess risk of women over men.
针对中毒性休克综合征的病例报告,1980年开展了六项病例对照研究。早期病例主要为经期女性,使用卫生棉条与疾病发作密切相关。由于这一发现的广泛传播,病例对照研究因不同的确诊率和回忆偏倚而存在问题。然而,女性中的病例数量如此之多,且与卫生棉条使用的关系如此显著,以至于如果要将结果归因于这些偏倚,就需要做出不合理的假设。这些研究显示了流行病学方法的力量,即使是在一种罕见疾病与一种常见行为相关的不利情况下。尽管中毒性休克综合征的绝对风险很小,但使用卫生棉条的女性患该病的风险比不使用卫生棉条的女性高出十倍以上,卫生棉条的使用足以解释女性相对于男性的额外风险。