Suppr超能文献

人体压力反射敏感性测量技术的比较。

Comparison of techniques for measuring baroreflex sensitivity in man.

作者信息

Goldstein D S, Horwitz D, Keiser H R

出版信息

Circulation. 1982 Aug;66(2):432-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.66.2.432.

Abstract

Because discrepancies about baroreflex sensitivity in essential hypertension may have resulted from the use of different measurement techniques, we assessed the extent to which the results of different techniques agree in the same subjects. The eight techniques studied were the change in RR interval per unit change in systolic pressure during the Valsalva maneuver, upon release of the Valsalva maneuver, after injection of phenylephrine and after injection of nitroglycerin; the changes in RR interval and in systolic pressure per mm Hg externally applied neck suction; and the changes in RR interval and systolic pressure per mm Hg externally applied neck pressure. The average intercorrelation among these measures in 30 subjects was statistically significant (r = 0.36, p less than 0.01), but suggests that variance in one measure accounted for an average of about 13% of the variance in other measures. Standard deviations among subjects were often as large as the mean, indicating important interindividual variability as well. These findings demonstrate that baroreflex sensitivity varies widely among subjects and that different techniques for measuring baroreflex sensitivity probably measure different aspects of baroreflex function.

摘要

由于原发性高血压患者压力反射敏感性的差异可能源于使用了不同的测量技术,我们评估了不同技术在同一受试者中的结果一致性程度。所研究的八种技术分别是:在瓦尔萨尔瓦动作期间、瓦尔萨尔瓦动作结束后、注射去氧肾上腺素后以及注射硝酸甘油后,收缩压每单位变化时RR间期的变化;每毫米汞柱外部施加颈部吸引时RR间期和收缩压的变化;以及每毫米汞柱外部施加颈部压力时RR间期和收缩压的变化。这30名受试者中这些测量指标之间的平均相互关联具有统计学意义(r = 0.36,p < 0.01),但表明一个测量指标的方差平均约占其他测量指标方差的13%。受试者之间的标准差通常与均值一样大,这也表明个体间存在重要的变异性。这些发现表明,压力反射敏感性在受试者之间差异很大,并且不同的压力反射敏感性测量技术可能测量的是压力反射功能的不同方面。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验