Rodak L, Babiuk L A, Acres S D
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Jul;16(1):34-40. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.1.34-40.1982.
The sensitivity of a radioimmunoassay (RIA), an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and a serum neutralization assay (SN) for detecting antibodies to bovine coronavirus in serum and colostrum were compared. Although there proved to be a good correlation among all three assays (r = 0.915 and 0.964 for RIA with SN and ELISA, respectively), RIA and ELISA proved to be at least 10 times more sensitive than neutralization tests. By using these techniques, it was possible to detect a time-dependent decrease in antibody levels in bovine colostrum after parturition. Using ELISA, we demonstrated that 12 of 12 herds in Saskatchewan, and 109 of 110 animals tested, and antibody to bovine coronavirus. There was no elevated antibody response in serum or lacteal secretions of cows vaccinated once or twice with a commercially available modified live rota-coronavirus vaccine. In addition to being more sensitive than SN, ELISA and RIA proved to have other advantages for measuring antibody levels to bovine coronavirus and therefore warrant wider use as tools in diagnostic virology.
比较了放射免疫分析(RIA)、酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和血清中和试验(SN)检测血清和初乳中牛冠状病毒抗体的敏感性。尽管这三种检测方法之间存在良好的相关性(RIA与SN和ELISA的相关性分别为r = 0.915和0.964),但RIA和ELISA的敏感性至少比中和试验高10倍。通过使用这些技术,可以检测到产后牛初乳中抗体水平随时间的下降。使用ELISA,我们证明了萨斯喀彻温省的12个牛群中的12个,以及所检测的110头动物中的109头,均存在牛冠状病毒抗体。用市售的改良活轮状-冠状病毒疫苗接种一次或两次的奶牛,其血清或乳汁分泌物中抗体反应并未升高。除了比SN更敏感外,ELISA和RIA在测量牛冠状病毒抗体水平方面还具有其他优势,因此作为诊断病毒学工具值得更广泛地使用。