• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[新城疫病毒毒株在鸡胚成纤维细胞培养物中的比较研究]

[Comparative study of strains of Newcastle disease virus in cell cultures of chick embryo fibroblast].

作者信息

Khadzhiev G

出版信息

Vet Med Nauki. 1982;19(1):33-40.

PMID:7112921
Abstract

Comparative investigations were carried out with local velogenic strains (2 viscerotropic--Haskovo and Bregovo, and neurotropic--Rosa and Toutrakan) and 6 standard strains of the Newcastle disease virus, belonging to various pathogenic groups, in tissue cultures of chick embryo fibroblasts. The four local strains as well as the velogenic one (The. GB) and the mesogenic standard strains (Komarov, Roakin, and Hertfordshire) were reproduced in such cultures, producing a clear cytopathic effect without preliminary adaptation passages. The two strains studied parallel to the others, that were of velogenic pathogenic type (La Sota and Hitchner B1) did not produce cytopathogenic effect, and the cultural liquids did not poses agglutination activity with regard to chicken erythrocytes. The average infection titers in tissue cultures of chick embryo fibroblasts (TCID50) for the particular strains in an experiment varied in a wide range and proved higher with the velogenic (regardless of the fact that they belonged to the viscero- and neurotropic pathogenic type) that with the mesogenic strains. The TCID50/cm3 titer ratio of the strains with regard to their corresponding infection titers in chick embryos (EID50/cm3) also varied in a wide range, but invariably in favour of EID50. The latter was more strongly expressed for the mesogenic strain than for the velogenic pathotype strain of the Newcastle disease in experimental conditions.

摘要

采用鸡胚成纤维细胞组织培养法,对本地速发型毒株(2种嗜内脏型——哈斯科沃和布雷戈沃毒株,以及嗜神经型——罗莎和图特拉坎毒株)和6种新城疫病毒标准毒株进行了比较研究,这些标准毒株属于不同的致病组。4种本地毒株以及速发型毒株(The. GB)和中等毒力标准毒株(科马罗夫、罗阿金和赫特福德郡毒株)在这种培养物中得以增殖,无需预先传代适应就产生了明显的细胞病变效应。与其他毒株平行研究的另外2种毒株,即速发型致病型毒株(拉索塔和希钦纳B1)未产生细胞病变效应,培养液对鸡红细胞也没有凝集活性。实验中各毒株在鸡胚成纤维细胞组织培养物中的平均感染滴度(TCID50)差异很大,且事实证明,速发型毒株(无论其属于嗜内脏型还是嗜神经型致病类型)的平均感染滴度高于中等毒力毒株。各毒株的TCID50/cm³滴度与它们在鸡胚中的相应感染滴度(EID50/cm³)之比也差异很大,但总是有利于EID50。在实验条件下,新城疫中等毒力毒株的这种情况比速发型致病型毒株表现得更明显。

相似文献

1
[Comparative study of strains of Newcastle disease virus in cell cultures of chick embryo fibroblast].[新城疫病毒毒株在鸡胚成纤维细胞培养物中的比较研究]
Vet Med Nauki. 1982;19(1):33-40.
2
[Plaque formation by strains of Newcastle disease virus in monolayers of chick embryo fibroblasts].[新城疫病毒毒株在鸡胚成纤维细胞单层中形成蚀斑]
Vet Med Nauki. 1982;19(2):35-45.
3
[Properties of local velogenic strains of Newcastle disease virus in poultry].[家禽新城疫病毒地方速发型毒株的特性]
Vet Med Nauki. 1981;18(8):25-32.
4
[Newcastle disease virus in tissue cultures studied by an immunofluorescence method].[采用免疫荧光法对组织培养中的新城疫病毒进行的研究]
Vet Med Nauki. 1984;21(5):27-32.
5
The role of interferon in interference and auto-interference elicited by Newcastle disease virus.干扰素在新城疫病毒引发的干扰和自身干扰中的作用。
Acta Microbiol Acad Sci Hung. 1975;22(2):137-44.
6
[Typing of Newcastle virus isolates by mean death time of chickens in the cloacal test].[通过泄殖腔试验中鸡的平均死亡时间对新城疫病毒分离株进行分型]
Vet Med Nauki. 1987;24(5):16-26.
7
[Effect of 5-iodo-2-deoxyuridine (IDU) on Newcastle disease virus replication in cell cultures].[5-碘-2-脱氧尿苷(IDU)对细胞培养中新城疫病毒复制的影响]
Pol Arch Weter. 1979;22(1):71-85.
8
Characterization of Newcastle disease viruses isolated from migratory waterfowl in the Atlantic flyway.对从大西洋飞行路线上的迁徙水禽中分离出的新城疫病毒的特性分析。
Avian Dis. 1975 Jan-Mar;19(1):142-9.
9
Competition between nonplaquing and plaquing strains of Newcastle disease virus as affected by temperature.温度对新城疫病毒非蚀斑形成株与蚀斑形成株之间竞争的影响
Avian Dis. 1976 Apr-Jun;20(2):293-8.
10
[Studies on canine distemper virus. I. Virus cultivation in cell cultures].[犬瘟热病毒研究。I. 病毒在细胞培养物中的培养]
Pol Arch Weter. 1986;24(3):315-26.