• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阶级、教育和医疗保健对发展中社会婴儿死亡率的影响:以泰国农村为例。

The impact of class, education, and health care on infant mortality in a developing society: the case of rural Thailand.

作者信息

Frenzen P D, Hogan D P

出版信息

Demography. 1982 Aug;19(3):391-408.

PMID:7117632
Abstract

Demographic and social factors affecting infant mortality in rural northern Thailand are examined using log-linear modified multiple regression models and data drawn from a representative sample of married couples in Chiang Mai and Chiang Rai provinces. Demographic factors do not account for the effects of variations in parental ability or willingness to provide adequate infant care. The final model estimated incorporated both these social dimensions of child care. Parental ability, measured by father's social class, mother's health information, and local community development levels, continued to have significant independent effects upon infant survival. Parental willingness, measured by parent's beliefs about intergenerational wealth transfers, no longer had a significant effect net of other social variables, but infant survival was still affected by whether both parents wanted a birth.

摘要

利用对数线性修正多元回归模型以及从清迈府和清莱府已婚夫妇代表性样本中获取的数据,对影响泰国北部农村地区婴儿死亡率的人口和社会因素进行了研究。人口因素无法解释父母提供充分婴儿照料的能力或意愿差异所产生的影响。最终估计的模型纳入了儿童照料的这两个社会层面。以父亲的社会阶层、母亲的健康信息以及当地社区发展水平衡量的父母能力,继续对婴儿存活情况产生显著的独立影响。以父母对代际财富转移的信念衡量的父母意愿,在扣除其他社会变量后不再具有显著影响,但婴儿存活情况仍受父母双方是否想要生育这一因素的影响。

相似文献

1
The impact of class, education, and health care on infant mortality in a developing society: the case of rural Thailand.阶级、教育和医疗保健对发展中社会婴儿死亡率的影响:以泰国农村为例。
Demography. 1982 Aug;19(3):391-408.
2
Changes in fertility patterns can improve child survival in Southeast Asia.生育模式的改变能够提高东南亚地区儿童的存活率。
Asia Pac Pop Policy. 1993 Dec(27):1-4.
3
A multi-level analysis of the determinants of fertility in the four regions of Thailand.泰国四个地区生育率决定因素的多层次分析。
Asia Pac Popul J. 1992 Mar;7(1):51-64.
4
Fertility and family planning in rural northern Thailand.泰国北部农村地区的生育与计划生育
Stud Fam Plann. 1978 Aug;9(8):212-21.
5
Infant mortality, its components and correlates: findings from a longitudinal study in rural Karnataka, India.婴儿死亡率及其构成因素与相关因素:印度卡纳塔克邦农村地区一项纵向研究的结果
Genus. 1991 Jan-Jun;47(1-2):89-108.
6
Individual and environmental influence on infant and child mortality in rural Sierra Leone: a multivariate analysis.个人和环境因素对塞拉利昂农村婴幼儿死亡率的影响:多变量分析
Ren Kou Xue Kan (Taipei). 1989 Jun(12):155-85.
7
Factors affecting the probability and timing of parity progression in Egypt.影响埃及产次进展概率和时间的因素。
Egypt Popul Fam Plann Rev. 1993 Jun;27(1):2-18.
8
Differentials in child mortality and health care in Pakistan.巴基斯坦儿童死亡率与医疗保健方面的差异。
Pak Dev Rev. 1992 Winter;31(4 Pt 2):1051-8.
9
The impact of female education on fertility desires in Bangladesh.女性教育对孟加拉国生育意愿的影响。
Rural Demogr. 1985;12(1-2):41-53.
10
Community variations in infant and child mortality in rural Jordan.约旦农村地区婴幼儿死亡率的社区差异
J Dev Areas. 1983 Jul;17(4):473-89.

引用本文的文献

1
Fertility intentions and child health in India: Women's use of health services, breastfeeding, and official birth documentation following an unwanted birth.印度的生育意愿和儿童健康:意外生育后妇女对卫生服务的使用、母乳喂养和正式出生证明。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 4;16(11):e0259311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259311. eCollection 2021.
2
Death and Desirability: Retrospective Reporting of Unintended Pregnancy After a Child's Death.死亡与意愿:儿童死亡后意外怀孕的回顾性报告
Demography. 2016 Jun;53(3):805-34. doi: 10.1007/s13524-016-0475-9.
3
Direct and indirect effects of childhood conditions on survival and health among male and female elderly in China.

本文引用的文献

1
The child survival hypothesis.儿童生存假说。
Popul Stud (Camb). 1976 Jul;30(2):263-78. doi: 10.1080/00324728.1976.10412734.
2
Child survival and intervals between pregnancies in Guayaquil, Ecuador.厄瓜多尔瓜亚基尔的儿童生存和妊娠间隔。
Popul Stud (Camb). 1975 Nov;29(3):479-96. doi: 10.1080/00324728.1975.10412712.
3
Neo-natal mortality in South Asia: The special role of tetanus.南亚的新生儿死亡率:破伤风的特殊作用。
童年状况对中国老年男性和女性生存与健康的直接和间接影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Oct;119:207-14. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.07.003. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
4
Understanding the association between maternal education and use of health services in Ghana: exploring the role of health knowledge.理解加纳母婴教育与卫生服务使用之间的关联:探索卫生知识的作用。
J Biosoc Sci. 2012 Nov;44(6):733-47. doi: 10.1017/S0021932012000041. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
5
Adult education and child mortality in India: the influence of caste, household wealth, and urbanization.印度的成人教育与儿童死亡率:种姓、家庭财富及城市化的影响
Epidemiology. 2008 Mar;19(2):294-301. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181632c75.
6
A hazards-model analysis of the covariates of infant and child mortality in Sri Lanka.斯里兰卡婴幼儿死亡率协变量的风险模型分析。
Demography. 1983 Feb;20(1):1-26.
Popul Stud (Camb). 1980 Jul;34(2):321-35. doi: 10.1080/00324728.1980.10410393.
4
The mechanisms of demographic change in historical perspective.
Popul Stud (Camb). 1981 Mar;35(1):5-27.
5
Antecedents to contraceptive innovation: evidence from rural Northern Thailand.避孕创新的先行因素:来自泰国北部农村的证据。
Demography. 1981 Nov;18(4):597-614.
6
Effects of some factors on neonatal and postneonatal mortality. Analysis by a binary variable multiple regression method.某些因素对新生儿及新生儿后期死亡率的影响。采用二元变量多元回归方法进行分析。
Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1971 Jan;49(1):33-57.
7
Infant mortality rates: socioeconomic factors. United States.婴儿死亡率:社会经济因素。美国。
Vital Health Stat 1. 1972 Mar;22(14):1-68.
8
Economic and social correlates of infant mortality: a cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of 63 selected countries.婴儿死亡率的经济和社会关联因素:对63个选定国家的横断面与纵向分析
Soc Biol. 1975 Winter;22(4):315-25. doi: 10.1080/19485565.1975.9988188.
9
Social class and infant mortality.社会阶层与婴儿死亡率。
Soc Sci Med (1967). 1977 May;11(8-9):453-70. doi: 10.1016/0037-7856(77)90022-1.
10
Poverty and infant mortality in the United States.
Am Sociol Rev. 1979 Apr;44(2):280-97.