Scherwitz L W, Evans L A, Hennrikus D J, Vallbona C
Med Care. 1982 Jul;20(7):727-38. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198207000-00008.
Three studies of blood pressure measurement were conducted in two primary care clinics. In study I, procedures for taking blood pressure were observed for seven nurses, and their readings were compared with readings taken in a standard manner. The results show that the nurses' procedure needed improvement; the systolic/diastolic discrepancies with the standard averaged 10.2/7.5 mmHg. In study II, the nurses were trained to improve their procedure, and readings were again compared. The results show improvement for moderate, but not for large, discrepancies in diastolic readings. In study III, two physicians' procedure for taking blood pressure indicated that their procedures could also be improved. Overall, there was little correlation between potential biases in providers' procedures and discrepancies with the standard. The discrepancies between the nurse and physician readings led to different treatment indicators in 22-26 per cent of the observations.
在两家基层医疗诊所进行了三项血压测量研究。在研究I中,观察了七名护士测量血压的程序,并将他们的读数与以标准方式测量的读数进行比较。结果表明,护士的程序需要改进;与标准值的收缩压/舒张压差异平均为10.2/7.5 mmHg。在研究II中,对护士进行了培训以改进他们的程序,并再次比较读数。结果显示,舒张压读数中的中度差异有所改善,但重度差异没有改善。在研究III中,两名医生测量血压的程序表明他们的程序也可以改进。总体而言,医疗服务提供者程序中的潜在偏差与与标准值的差异之间几乎没有相关性。在22%至26%的观察结果中,护士和医生的读数差异导致了不同的治疗指标。