Fava G A, Kellner R, Munari F, Pavan L
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1982 Jul;66(1):26-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1982.tb00911.x.
The Hamilton Rating Scale for depression (HDRS) has become the standard observer rating scale for depression, yet there are no adequate data from normal samples. The present study was carried out in northern Italy. The purposes were 1) to examine the ratings in normals and 2) to examine the scale's validity in the different language and culture. The scale was used in 40 normals and 40 depressives who were matched. Two self-rating scales of depression were administered: the Symptom Rating Test and the Symptom Questionnaire. The results show that the HDRS is a valid measure in that it sensitively discriminates between depressed patients and normals. The findings support Hamilton's view that only the first 17 items of the scale are appropriate for computing the score. The use of self-rating scales yielded additional information. The misclassification rate of the Symptom Rating Test was similar to that of the HDRS. The combined use of Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) and HDRS appears to be more reliable for the selection of depressed patients for research than the RDC only.
汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HDRS)已成为抑郁症的标准观察者评定量表,但尚无来自正常样本的充分数据。本研究在意大利北部开展。目的如下:1)检查正常人群的评分;2)检验该量表在不同语言和文化中的效度。该量表用于40名正常人和40名相匹配的抑郁症患者。使用了两种抑郁自评量表:症状评定测试和症状问卷。结果表明,HDRS是一种有效的测量工具,因为它能敏锐地区分抑郁症患者和正常人。研究结果支持汉密尔顿的观点,即该量表仅前17项适合计算得分。使用自评量表可提供更多信息。症状评定测试的错误分类率与HDRS相似。与仅使用研究诊断标准(RDC)相比,联合使用RDC和HDRS在选择抑郁症患者进行研究时似乎更可靠。