Suppr超能文献

“高悬于报头之上”:关于作者身份的思考

"Hanging from the masthead": reflections on authorship.

作者信息

Burman K D

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 1982 Oct;97(4):602-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-97-4-602.

Abstract

Authorship of a scientific article should imply expertise on its content and thorough knowledge of the investigation reported. Because the number of authors per article has dramatically increased, I question whether these criteria for authorship are applied. Another explanation for this increase is that authors add names to the byline without reference to any set of criteria, resulting in the designation of coauthorship when not warranted. The medical community needs to redefine the proper procedure and criteria for deciding on authorship and to strictly abide by these procedures. Specific recommendations center around the protocol as the initial instrument of communication. Who should be designated as author, and the order of names, should be negotiated before and during the study, and written communication with other involved laboratories should result in more appropriate authorship attribution.

摘要

一篇科学文章的作者身份应意味着对其内容的专业知识以及对所报道研究的透彻了解。由于每篇文章的作者数量急剧增加,我质疑这些作者身份标准是否得到了应用。这种增加的另一种解释是,作者在署名时添加名字而不参考任何一套标准,导致在不恰当的情况下指定共同作者。医学界需要重新定义决定作者身份的适当程序和标准,并严格遵守这些程序。具体建议围绕作为初始沟通工具的方案展开。谁应被指定为作者以及名字的顺序,应在研究之前和期间进行协商,并且与其他相关实验室的书面沟通应导致更恰当的作者身份归属。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验