Itami Y, Akamatsu N, Tomita Y, Nagai M
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (1978). 1982;100(1):11-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00381537.
There are two methods for the fixation of prostheses to bone; one is a method using bone cement and another is the direct fixation of the prostheses to bone. Four types of animal experiments were performed to compare the two methods of fixation. A small pyramid shaped test piece was used to compare the fixation capacity of the socket spike. Also, a special test piece was used to study the time of bone formation, to check the fixation capacity of bone bar formation occurring in the hole in the based part of the prosthetic component. furthermore, models of prosthetic stem and socket were made and attached to the femur and ilium of dog to perform fixation tests and fatigue tests. As a result, any of the tests proved that the direct fixation method without the usage of bone cement was superior to the fixation method using bone cement.
将假体固定于骨上有两种方法;一种是使用骨水泥的方法,另一种是将假体直接固定于骨上。进行了四项动物实验以比较这两种固定方法。使用一个小的金字塔形试件来比较髋臼钉的固定能力。此外,还使用了一个特殊的试件来研究骨形成的时间,以检查在假体部件基部孔中发生的骨条形成的固定能力。此外,制作了假体柄和髋臼的模型并将其附着于狗的股骨和髂骨上,以进行固定测试和疲劳测试。结果,任何一项测试都证明,不使用骨水泥的直接固定方法优于使用骨水泥的固定方法。