Horai Y, Ishizaki T, Sasaki T, Watanabe M, Kabe J
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1982;23(2):111-21. doi: 10.1007/BF00545964.
Theophylline disposition after an intravenous test dose of aminophylline was determined in 83 subjects: 7 patients with and 58 without congestive heart failure (CHF), and 18 healthy controls. Based on the pharmacokinetics of theophylline in the individual, the oral dosage of aminophylline was scheduled to attain steady-state trough theophylline concentrations (Cpred) near the therapeutic margin. Significant differences in theophylline clearance with a relatively constant volume of distribution were observed between various groups divided by age, smoking habit and CHF; the significantly different (p less than 0.001) mean clearance values were: 0.042 +/- 0.016 l/h/kg (mean +/- SD) in patients without CHF (n = 58) as opposed to 0.016 +/- 0.001 l/h/kg in patients with CHF (n = 7), 0.038 +/- 0.013 l/h/kg in non-smokers (n = 59) versus 0.054 +/- 0.015 l/h/kg in smoking subjects (n = 17), and 0.030 +/- 0.010 l/h/kg in elderly (greater than 60 years) non-smoking patients (n = 7) versus 0.057 +/- 0.017 l/h/kg in smoking patients (n = 5) aged 40 to 59 years. No gender-related difference was detected in theophylline disposition. For all subjects together (n = 83), there was no significant correlation between age and clearance (r = -0.111, p greater than 0.1). The multivariate analysis indicated that the overall variability in theophylline clearance was affected first by the smoking habit (t = 4.960; p less than 0.001) and second by CHF (t = -3.052; p less than 0.001), but not by age (t = 1.140) or by sex (t = 0.069). 78% of the patients who did not have CHF required a daily dose of aminophylline of 600 to 900 mg, whereas a dose of 300 to 450 mg was the rule in patients with CHF. The measured steady-state minimum concentration (Cmeas) ranged from 5.4 to 14.6 micrograms/ml (9.0 +/- 2.2 micrograms/ml: mean +/- SD) which was in good agreement with the Cpred (5.6 to 13.6, 9.0 +/- 1.6 micrograms/ml) in all patients (n = 60) who received the oral dose of aminophylline calculated from the test dose. The overall prediction error was -0.08 +/- 1.83 micrograms/ml (-1.42 +/- 19.90%); only 3 of 60 measurements were found to be outside +/- 2 SD. It is concluded that using a test dose to individualize aminophylline therapy is likely to remain the most reliable means to assure the maximum therapeutic benefit in patients with airway obstruction.
对83名受试者静脉注射氨茶碱试验剂量后测定了茶碱的处置情况:7例充血性心力衰竭(CHF)患者、58例无CHF患者以及18名健康对照者。根据个体中茶碱的药代动力学,安排氨茶碱的口服剂量以达到接近治疗范围的稳态谷浓度(Cpred)。在按年龄、吸烟习惯和CHF分组的不同组之间观察到茶碱清除率存在显著差异,而分布容积相对恒定;显著不同(p小于0.001)的平均清除率值分别为:无CHF患者(n = 58)为0.042±0.016升/小时/千克(均值±标准差),而CHF患者(n = 7)为0.016±0.001升/小时/千克;非吸烟者(n = 59)为0.038±0.013升/小时/千克,吸烟者(n = 17)为0.054±0.015升/小时/千克;60岁以上非吸烟患者(n = 7)为0.030±0.010升/小时/千克,40至59岁吸烟患者(n = 5)为0.057±0.017升/小时/千克。未检测到茶碱处置存在性别相关差异。对于所有受试者(n = 83),年龄与清除率之间无显著相关性(r = -0.111,p大于0.1)。多变量分析表明,茶碱清除率的总体变异性首先受吸烟习惯影响(t = 4.96;p小于0.001),其次受CHF影响(t = -3.052;p小于0.001),但不受年龄(t = 1.140)或性别(t = 0.069)影响。无CHF的患者中78%需要每日剂量600至900毫克的氨茶碱,而CHF患者通常剂量为300至450毫克。测得的稳态最低浓度(Cmeas)范围为5.4至14.6微克/毫升(9.0±2.2微克/毫升:均值±标准差),这与所有接受根据试验剂量计算的口服氨茶碱剂量的患者(n = 60)的Cpred(5.6至13.6,9.0±1.6微克/毫升)高度一致。总体预测误差为-0.08±1.83微克/毫升(-1.42±19.90%);60次测量中仅3次超出±2标准差。结论是,使用试验剂量个体化氨茶碱治疗可能仍是确保气道阻塞患者获得最大治疗益处的最可靠方法。