Anderson S D, Schoeffel R E
Eur J Respir Dis. 1982 Sep;63(5):472-80.
A study was performed to investigate the loss of heat and water from the airways during repeated exercise challenge. Twenty-six asthmatic patients performed 6-8 min exercise on a bicycle ergometer at a workload equivalent to 57-85% of their predicted maximum working capacity. Sixteen patients performed two exercise tests separated by 40-52 min. Exercise-induced asthma (EIA) occurred in all patients after initial challenge but eight had significant protection from EIA following a second challenge. This protection was not associated with a reduction in heat and water loss from the airways during exercise. A further 10 patients performed two exercise tests 2-3 h apart. The second test was preceded by the administration of 200 microgram salbutamol aerosol. There was no significant difference between the two tests in loss of heat and water from the airways during exercise. Exercise-induced asthma occurred in all patients after the initial challenge but was inhibited by the salbutamol after the second challenge. Thus the reduction in EIA as a result of a refractory period or in response to aerosol salbutamol is not due to changes in heat and water loss from the airways during exercise.
一项研究旨在调查重复运动激发试验期间气道的热量和水分流失情况。26名哮喘患者在自行车测力计上进行6 - 8分钟的运动,运动强度相当于其预测最大工作能力的57 - 85%。16名患者进行了两次运动测试,两次测试间隔40 - 52分钟。初次激发试验后所有患者均出现运动诱发性哮喘(EIA),但8名患者在第二次激发试验后对EIA有显著的保护作用。这种保护作用与运动期间气道热量和水分流失的减少无关。另外10名患者进行了两次间隔2 - 3小时的运动测试。第二次测试前给予200微克沙丁胺醇气雾剂。两次测试期间运动时气道热量和水分流失无显著差异。初次激发试验后所有患者均出现运动诱发性哮喘,但第二次激发试验后沙丁胺醇抑制了该症状。因此,由于不应期或对沙丁胺醇气雾剂的反应导致的EIA减轻并非由于运动期间气道热量和水分流失的变化。