• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一些市售测试磁带的校准音与音量单位(VU)电平之间的关系。

Relationship between the calibration tone and speech volume unit (VU) levels for some commercially available test tapes.

作者信息

Edgerton B J, Beattie R C, Helmerich L F

出版信息

Ear Hear. 1982 Sep-Oct;3(5):280-3. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198209000-00009.

DOI:10.1097/00003446-198209000-00009
PMID:7141143
Abstract

The relationship between the calibration tone and speech volume unit (VU) levels for nine commercially recorded speech tests was studied. Two procedures were used. In procedure 1, experienced clinicians reported observations of four different audiometer VU meters responding to six commercially available speech tests. Differences in magnitude estimates among judges were usually about 1 dB or less. Peak VU level deviations from the zeroed calibration tone were within +/- 1.5 VU except for the Fulton Lewis Jr. recording, which varied by about -4.8 VU. In procedure 2, a video system was used to recorded precisely VU meter responses to clinical speech materials. Differences between the calibration tones and speech levels were similar to those obtained using multiple observers. Statistically significant (p less than or equal to 0.01) differences were found between the speech levels of the commercial test recordings.

摘要

研究了九种商业录制的言语测试中校准音与言语音量单位(VU)水平之间的关系。使用了两种方法。在方法1中,经验丰富的临床医生报告了四个不同听力计VU表对六种市售言语测试的反应观察结果。评判者之间的量级估计差异通常约为1 dB或更小。除了小富尔顿·刘易斯的录音,其变化约为-4.8 VU外,峰值VU水平与归零校准音的偏差在+/- 1.5 VU范围内。在方法2中,使用视频系统精确记录VU表对临床言语材料的反应。校准音与言语水平之间的差异与使用多名观察者获得的差异相似。在商业测试录音的言语水平之间发现了具有统计学意义(p≤0.01)的差异。

相似文献

1
Relationship between the calibration tone and speech volume unit (VU) levels for some commercially available test tapes.一些市售测试磁带的校准音与音量单位(VU)电平之间的关系。
Ear Hear. 1982 Sep-Oct;3(5):280-3. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198209000-00009.
2
Amplitude (vu and rms) and Temporal (msec) Measures of Two Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 Recordings.西北大学听觉测试6号的两份录音的幅度(音量单位和均方根)及时间(毫秒)测量值
J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Apr;26(4):346-54. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.26.4.3.
3
A model of the VU (volume-unit) meter, with speech applications.一种带有语音应用的VU(音量单位)表模型。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Jan;121(1):279-85. doi: 10.1121/1.2387130.
4
Comparison of vu-meter-based and rms-based calibration of speech levels.基于VU表和均方根的语音电平校准比较。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Sep;126(3):EL97-9. doi: 10.1121/1.3204155.
5
Assessment of electromagnetic characteristics of the Willeford Central Auditory Processing Test Battery.威利福德中枢听觉处理测试组的电磁特性评估
J Speech Hear Res. 1983 Mar;26(1):18-21. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2601.18.
6
Letter: On the use of audio tape cassettes in speech audiometry.信函:关于在言语测听中使用盒式录音带的问题。
J Speech Hear Disord. 1974 May;39(2):229-30. doi: 10.1044/jshd.3902.229.
7
Influence of compact disk recording protocols on reliability and comparability of speech audiometry outcomes: acoustic analysis.光盘录制协议对言语测听结果的可靠性和可比性的影响:声学分析
J Laryngol Otol. 2010 Aug;124(8):859-63. doi: 10.1017/S0022215110000782. Epub 2010 May 5.
8
Pure-Tone-Spondee Threshold Relationships in Functional Hearing Loss: A Test of Loudness Contribution.功能性听力损失中的纯音-扬扬格阈关系:响度贡献测试
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Jan 1;60(1):136-143. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-H-15-0330.
9
The contour test of loudness perception.响度感知的等高线测试。
Ear Hear. 1997 Oct;18(5):388-400. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199710000-00004.
10
Reliability of the Tillman-Olsen procedure for determination of spondee threshold using recorded and live voice presentations.使用录制语音和现场语音呈现来测定言语清晰度阈的蒂尔曼-奥尔森程序的可靠性。
J Am Audiol Soc. 1977 Jan-Feb;2(4):159-62.