Clarke I C
Orthop Clin North Am. 1982 Oct;13(4):681-707.
The main flaws to be overcome in realizing the potential success of the double-cup arthroplasty procedure are failures due to femoral cup loosening, acetabular cup loosening, and femoral-neck fractures. The clinical uncertainties include the selection of a suitable patient with adequate bone stock and the technical difficulties associated with (I) reaming the acetabulum adequately, (2) reaming down onto the neck without violating it, and (3) anchoring the components securely by interdigitation of acrylic cement. The higher frictional torques of the double-cup arthroplasty designs are not a clinical loosening issue--the resulting acetabular cement-bone shear stresses are very low. Computer models of both the femoral and acetabular components predict significant stress shielding of the cancellous bone under metal femoral shells. At the rim of the femoral cup, the stresses are increased by a factor of 3 owing to the stress concentration effect and can rise to a factor of 10 if cystic or osteoporotic changes are present. This finding if confirmed in the three-dimensional models may explain some of the femoral neck fractures. The thin polyethylene acetabular cups may also cause a stress concentration effect on the underlying cement and bone. This may explain the higher incidence of radiographic loosening around the acetabulum in double-cup arthroplasty designs compared with total hip replacements. Metal-backed sockets may reduce cancellous bone stresses and appear advantageous. There is no clinical evidence of unusual wear or wear-related problems. However, new material formulations are now either in use or being planned for the double-cup arthroplasty designs. As yet, there have been no published data on hip simulator wear for the efficacy of any of the current or proposed changes. Biologic fixation appears to be the theme for the 1980s. However, the combination of technology, design instrumentation, and patient selection will be critical in achieving success with this technically difficult procedure.
要实现双杯关节成形术潜在的成功,需要克服的主要缺陷是由于股骨杯松动、髋臼杯松动和股骨颈骨折导致的失败。临床不确定性包括选择具有足够骨量的合适患者,以及与以下方面相关的技术难题:(1)充分扩锉髋臼;(2)在不损伤股骨颈的情况下向股骨颈扩锉;(3)通过丙烯酸骨水泥的相互交错牢固固定假体组件。双杯关节成形术设计中较高的摩擦扭矩并非临床松动问题——由此产生的髋臼骨水泥-骨剪切应力非常低。股骨和髋臼组件的计算机模型预测,金属股骨壳下的松质骨会出现明显的应力遮挡。在股骨杯边缘,由于应力集中效应,应力会增加3倍,如果存在囊性或骨质疏松性改变,应力可增加到10倍。如果这一发现在三维模型中得到证实,可能解释一些股骨颈骨折的原因。薄聚乙烯髋臼杯也可能对其下方的骨水泥和骨骼产生应力集中效应。这可能解释了与全髋关节置换相比,双杯关节成形术设计中髋臼周围影像学松动发生率较高的原因。金属背衬髋臼杯可能会降低松质骨应力,似乎具有优势。目前尚无异常磨损或与磨损相关问题的临床证据。然而,双杯关节成形术设计目前正在使用或计划使用新的材料配方。到目前为止,尚未有关于髋关节模拟器磨损的已发表数据,以评估任何当前或提议的改变的疗效。生物固定似乎是20世纪80年代的主题。然而,技术、设计器械和患者选择的结合对于成功实施这一技术难度较大的手术至关重要。