Suppr超能文献

氟哌啶醇对精神病患者的疗效及副作用:口服与静脉注射对比

Efficacy and side effects of haloperidol in psychotic patients: oral versus intravenous administration.

作者信息

Möller H J, Kissling W, Lang C, Doerr P, Pirke K M, von Zerssen D

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 1982 Dec;139(12):1571-5. doi: 10.1176/ajp.139.12.1571.

Abstract

It is a commonly held view among clinicians that intravenously administered haloperidol has a greater antipsychotic effect than oral haloperidol. To test this hypothesis, the authors carried out a double-blind study on patients with acute schizophrenia and patients with schizophreniform or schizoaffective (with manic features) psychoses. Using biologically equivalent doses, they found that intravenously administered haloperidol was slightly more effective during the first 3 hours; thereafter the route of administration did not make a difference in effectiveness.

摘要

临床医生中普遍认为,静脉注射氟哌啶醇比口服氟哌啶醇具有更强的抗精神病作用。为了验证这一假设,作者对急性精神分裂症患者以及精神分裂样或分裂情感性(伴有躁狂特征)精神病患者进行了一项双盲研究。使用生物等效剂量时,他们发现静脉注射氟哌啶醇在最初3小时内效果稍好;此后给药途径对疗效没有影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验