Graber D, Fankhauser S
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1978 Nov 18;108(46):1807-9.
Four groups of adult diabetics who had never received insulin before were treated for 10--12 months with the following insulin preparations: 1. Insulin Lente, purified by conventional methods; 2. Insulin Lente, purified by gel-filtration; 3. Insulin Lente Monocomponent (MC); 4. Insulin Monotard. Insulin antibodies were measured in these four groups at regular intervals and compared. MC Lente is significantly less antigenic than conventional Lente insulin, but Monotard, a pure pork insulin preparation, is even less antigenic than MC Lente (all 3 Lente preparations contain 70% ox insulin). The average insulin requirement in the Monotard group is significantly lower than in the conventional Lente group.
四组此前从未接受过胰岛素治疗的成年糖尿病患者,使用以下胰岛素制剂进行了10至12个月的治疗:1. 采用传统方法纯化的慢胰岛素锌悬液;2. 通过凝胶过滤法纯化的慢胰岛素锌悬液;3. 单组分慢胰岛素锌悬液(MC);4. 中效胰岛素。定期对这四组患者测量胰岛素抗体并进行比较。单组分慢胰岛素锌悬液的抗原性明显低于传统慢胰岛素锌悬液,但中效胰岛素(一种纯猪胰岛素制剂)的抗原性甚至低于单组分慢胰岛素锌悬液(所有三种慢胰岛素锌悬液制剂均含70%牛胰岛素)。中效胰岛素组的平均胰岛素需求量明显低于传统慢胰岛素锌悬液组。