Suppr超能文献

研究诊断标准(RDC)中的抑郁亚型:它们有效吗?

RDC depressive subtypes: are they valid?

作者信息

Garvey M J, Tuason V B, Johnson R A, Valentine R

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 1982 Nov;43(11):442-4.

PMID:7174618
Abstract

Ninety patients meeting the Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) for major depressive disorder were further diagnosed using the RDC depressive subtypes. Patients with specific RDC subtype diagnoses were compared to those who did not meet the subtype criteria on several variables, including family history, illness course, work history, social history, previous treatment, quality of remissions, and symptomatology. Several items significantly differentiated patients diagnosed as primary, psychotic, and situational from those not so diagnosed: this supports the validity of these subtype categories. However, the study did not support the validity of the incapacitated, agitated, and retarded subtypes. No conclusions could be drawn regarding the endogenous, simple, or recurrent unipolar depressive subtypes.

摘要

90名符合重性抑郁障碍研究诊断标准(RDC)的患者进一步采用RDC抑郁亚型进行诊断。将具有特定RDC亚型诊断的患者与未符合亚型标准的患者在多个变量上进行比较,这些变量包括家族史、病程、工作史、社会史、既往治疗、缓解质量和症状学。几个项目显著区分了诊断为原发性、精神病性和情境性的患者与未如此诊断的患者:这支持了这些亚型分类的有效性。然而,该研究不支持无能力、激越和迟滞亚型的有效性。关于内源性、单纯性或复发性单相抑郁亚型无法得出结论。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验