Suppr超能文献

正常听力者与感音神经性听力受损者在安静环境及噪声环境下的辅音识别

Consonant identification in quiet and in noise with the normal and the sensorineural hearing-impaired.

作者信息

Givens G D, Jacobs-Condit L

出版信息

J Aud Res. 1981 Oct;21(4):279-85.

PMID:7186504
Abstract

This study determined the effect on consonant identification of speech-to-noise ratio; the California Consonant Test (CCT) was given to 20 normal-hearing young adults and 14 patients (mm age: 56.1 yrs) with sloping sensorineural hearing losses, SRT greater than 20 db, and DS less than 90% at MCL. The CCT was given individually at MCL in quiet and at that level in broad-band noise adjusted to yield 20, 10, 0, and -10 db S/N, consecutively. Mean percent-correct scores for the patients were 50, 44, 40, 38, and 32 in order, and were 97, 90, 73, 47, and 37 for the controls. Differences were significant between groups except for the 2 most difficult ratios. For the patients, regression analysis revealed that the slope of the line of best fit was not significantly different from zero. Confusion matrices constructed for each of the 5 noise conditions for each group revealed that at S/N of 10 db, normal Ss began consistent and systematic substitutions in manner and in place of articulation, never in voicing or nasality. This pattern was in general followed by the patients, except that substantial confusions existed also at the 2 easiest ratios.

摘要

本研究确定了言语噪声比对辅音识别的影响;对20名听力正常的年轻成年人以及14名(平均年龄:56.1岁)患有倾斜性感音神经性听力损失、言语接受阈(SRT)大于20分贝且在舒适响度级(MCL)时双耳间衰减(DS)小于90%的患者进行了加利福尼亚辅音测试(CCT)。CCT分别在安静环境下的MCL以及在宽带噪声中调整至产生20、10、0和 -10分贝的言语噪声比(S/N)水平时依次进行。患者的平均正确百分比分数依次为50、44、40、38和32,对照组的相应分数依次为97、90、73、47和37。除了两个最难的比率外,两组之间的差异具有显著性。对于患者而言,回归分析显示最佳拟合线的斜率与零无显著差异。为每组的5种噪声条件构建的混淆矩阵表明,在10分贝的S/N时,正常受试者开始在发音方式和发音部位上进行一致且系统的替换,而在浊音或鼻音方面则从未出现。患者总体上遵循这种模式,只是在两个最容易的比率时也存在大量混淆。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验