Suppr超能文献

跑步者对跑步机和自行车运动的心肺反应。

Cardiorespiratory response to treadmill and bicycle exercise in runners.

作者信息

Pannier J L, Vrijens J, Van Cauter C

出版信息

Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1980;43(3):243-51. doi: 10.1007/BF00421838.

Abstract

Maximal aerobic power and related variables during submaximal work were determined on the bicycle ergometer and on the treadmill in nine long-distance runners and in nine control subjects. During submaximal work, heart rate and pulmonary ventilation were similar with the two exercise procedures in each group, but the runners had lower values than the control subjects. During maximal exercise, oxygen uptake and pulmonary ventilation reached higher levels on the treadmill than on the bicycle egometer. The difference in VO2max was not significant in the control subjects (4.4%), but was more pronounced (12.8%) and highly significantly (p < 0.01) in the runners. The intergroup differences for VO2max between runners and controls were more marked during treadmill running (17.3%) than during bicycle exercise (8.5%). It is concluded tht the differences between the VO2max values obtained on the bicycle ergometer and on the treadmill are influenced by the training conditions of the subjects and that bicycle ergometry leads to a marked underestimation of maximal oxygen uptake in runners.

摘要

在自行车测力计和跑步机上,对9名长跑运动员和9名对照受试者进行了次最大运动量时的最大有氧能力及相关变量测定。在次最大运动量时,每组中两种运动方式下的心率和肺通气量相似,但长跑运动员的值低于对照受试者。在最大运动量时,跑步机上的摄氧量和肺通气量比自行车测力计上达到更高水平。最大摄氧量的差异在对照受试者中不显著(4.4%),但在长跑运动员中更明显(12.8%)且具有高度显著性(p < 0.01)。长跑运动员和对照受试者之间最大摄氧量的组间差异在跑步机跑步时(17.3%)比在自行车运动时(8.5%)更明显。得出的结论是,在自行车测力计和跑步机上测得的最大摄氧量值之间的差异受受试者训练条件的影响,并且自行车测力计法会导致对长跑运动员最大摄氧量的显著低估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验