Wilkinson H A, Rosenfeld S, Denherder D, Bronson R
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1981 Jan;44(1):23-8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.44.1.23.
The intracranial pressure "reserve" test seems to be the most reliable method of determining when the brain's natural mechanisms for pressure compensation for added intracranial volume have been compromised or exhausted. The test employs a timed sequence of intracranial fluid injections, but as a safety precaution injections are discontinued if intracranial pressure remains elevated more than 10 Torr over baseline. In this case, a linear extrapolation is then calculated to determine the elevation which might have been achieved by a full series of injections. However, this linear extrapolation has been criticised on the expectation that an exponential response should be expected. A series of experimental observations in dogs and baboons and a review of clinical records in humans have been made to determine the observed slope of increase following aliquot injection during performance of the intracranial pressure reserve test. In these species the observed response was actually linear in shape rather than exponential. This held true even for different initial baseline values and with different volumes of "lesion" balloon inflations in experimental animals. A theoretic explanation is proposed.
颅内压“储备”测试似乎是确定大脑对颅内额外容积进行压力补偿的自然机制何时受损或耗尽的最可靠方法。该测试采用按时间顺序进行的颅内液体注射,但作为安全预防措施,如果颅内压比基线升高超过10托,则停止注射。在这种情况下,然后计算线性外推法以确定如果进行完整系列注射可能达到的升高值。然而,这种线性外推法受到了批评,因为人们预期会有指数反应。已经对狗和狒狒进行了一系列实验观察,并对人类临床记录进行了回顾,以确定在颅内压储备测试过程中每次等分注射后观察到的升高斜率。在这些物种中,观察到的反应实际上是线性的,而不是指数的。即使对于不同的初始基线值以及实验动物中不同体积的“病变”球囊充气,情况也是如此。本文提出了一种理论解释。