Allen J K, Blanchard E B
Biofeedback Self Regul. 1980 Dec;5(4):427-38. doi: 10.1007/BF01001358.
A biofeedback-based stress management training program was experimentally evaluated using populations of middle-level managers from a large corporation. The training program, once-weekly 1-hour sessions for 6 weeks, combined frontal and other site EMG biofeedback, progressive relaxation and breathing exercises, cognitive stress management, and generalization techniques. Control groups participated in either the assessment procedures only or the assessment procedures and six once-weekly discussions of stress and the job on both an individual (two sessions) and group (four sessions) basis. Significant effects were found in self-report measures, state and trait anxiety, experience of stress; in physiological measures, basal frontal EMG and frontal EMG during recovery from stress, and finger temperature; and in ratings of overall job performance. However, no consistent advantage for the training group or either control group was found. Several possible explanations for the failure of the biofeedback-based stress management training condition to achieve a consistent advantage over the control conditions are presented.
基于生物反馈的压力管理培训项目通过对一家大公司的中层管理人员群体进行实验评估。该培训项目为期6周,每周一次,每次1小时,结合了额部及其他部位的肌电图生物反馈、渐进性放松和呼吸练习、认知压力管理以及泛化技术。对照组要么仅参与评估程序,要么参与评估程序以及就压力和工作进行的六次每周一次的个人(两次)和小组(四次)讨论。在自我报告测量、状态和特质焦虑、压力体验方面发现了显著效果;在生理测量方面,发现基础额部肌电图、压力恢复期间的额部肌电图以及手指温度有显著效果;在整体工作表现评分方面也有显著效果。然而,未发现培训组或任何一个对照组具有持续优势。文中提出了基于生物反馈的压力管理培训条件未能比对照条件取得持续优势的几种可能解释。