Pritchard M H, Jobbins K
J Clin Pathol. 1981 Apr;34(4):396-9. doi: 10.1136/jcp.34.4.396.
IgM rheumatoid factors have been measured in 92 patients by both laser nephelometry and the traditional hospital procedure of a latex slide test followed by differential agglutination titre (DAT). Of the results 86% were in accordance by both methods, but seronegative patients with a high nephelometry score all showed, after reference to their clinical state and previous investigations, that the nephelometry result more accurately represented their clinical state than the DAT, which was shown to be in error in five out of the six cases. Six seropositive patients with low nephelometry scores were also studied; three were in complete remission on gold or penicillamine therapy. Nephelometry is both technically simpler and more reliable than the traditional DAT method, and our results suggest that it has some advantages over the DAT in routine use.
采用激光散射比浊法和传统的医院乳胶玻片试验加鉴别凝集滴度(DAT)程序,对92例患者进行了IgM类风湿因子检测。两种方法的结果86%一致,但比浊法评分高的血清阴性患者,参照其临床状态和既往检查,发现比浊法结果比DAT更能准确反映其临床状态,6例中有5例显示DAT有误。还研究了6例比浊法评分低的血清阳性患者;3例在接受金制剂或青霉胺治疗后完全缓解。比浊法在技术上比传统的DAT方法更简单、更可靠,我们的结果表明,在常规应用中,比浊法比DAT有一些优势。