Nichter M
Cult Med Psychiatry. 1981 Mar;5(1):5-24. doi: 10.1007/BF00049156.
The negotiation of the illness experience by ayurvedic vaidya and South Kanarese patients suffering from specific sources of psychosocial distress is examined in light of the cultural patterning of illness and communication within the clinical context. The negotiation process is initiated by the posing of rhetorical questions about somatic and affective states and structured by a conceptual framework which relegates such states to humoral interrelationships. By establishing a humoral explanatory model for an illness episode or affective state which takes into account environmental and constitutional factors over which one has little control, responsibility is mollified and dialogue about personal problems eased. A comparison of the interaction between ayurvedic practitioners and patients and astrologers and clients is made in this regard. The socially integrative and adaptive consequences of ayurvedic therapy is considered vis a vis a portrayal of a popular vaidya therapy for a number of illnesses associated with the somatization of psychosocial stress.
从疾病的文化模式以及临床环境中的交流角度,研究了阿育吠陀医生与遭受特定社会心理困扰源的南卡纳拉患者对疾病体验的协商过程。协商过程始于对躯体和情感状态提出修辞性问题,并由一个概念框架构建,该框架将这些状态归为体液相互关系。通过为疾病发作或情感状态建立一个考虑到个人几乎无法控制的环境和体质因素的体液解释模型,减轻了责任感,并使关于个人问题的对话更加顺畅。在这方面,对阿育吠陀从业者与患者以及占星师与客户之间的互动进行了比较。相对于一种流行的阿育吠陀疗法对与心理社会压力躯体化相关的多种疾病的描述,考虑了阿育吠陀疗法的社会整合和适应性后果。