Schomerus H, Hamster W, Blunck H, Reinhard U, Mayer K, Dölle W
Dig Dis Sci. 1981 Jul;26(7):622-30. doi: 10.1007/BF01367675.
Forty patients with chronic liver disease and portal hypertension but without clinical signs of portasystemic encephalopathy (15 patients with nonalcoholic cirrhosis, 15 patients with alcoholic cirrhosis, and 10 patients with minimal EEG changes) and a control group of 12 patients with chronic alcohol pancreatitis were studied using an extensive psychometric program, which, in the same form, is used for expert reports on driving capacity. Of the cirrhotic patients, 60% were considered unfit to drive; in 25% driving capacity was questionable, 15% (only nonalcoholic cirrhotics) were considered fit to drive. In contrast 75% of the patients with alcoholic pancreatitis were considered fit to drive. Major defects were found only in three heavy alcoholics. Patients with alcoholic cirrhosis scored lower than patients with nonalcoholic cirrhosis. This was due to differences in liver function rather than to the effect of alcohol consumption. Patients with minimal EEG changes were practically all considered unfit to drive.
对40例患有慢性肝病和门静脉高压但无门体分流性脑病临床体征的患者(15例非酒精性肝硬化患者、15例酒精性肝硬化患者和10例脑电图仅有轻微变化的患者)以及12例慢性酒精性胰腺炎患者组成的对照组,使用一套广泛的心理测量程序进行了研究,该程序以相同形式用于有关驾驶能力的专家报告。在肝硬化患者中,60%被认为不适合驾驶;25%的患者驾驶能力存疑,15%(仅为非酒精性肝硬化患者)被认为适合驾驶。相比之下,75%的酒精性胰腺炎患者被认为适合驾驶。仅在三名重度酗酒者中发现了严重缺陷。酒精性肝硬化患者的得分低于非酒精性肝硬化患者。这是由于肝功能差异而非饮酒的影响。脑电图仅有轻微变化的患者几乎都被认为不适合驾驶。