Schomerus H, Hamster W
II. Medizinische Klinik Diakoniekrankenhaus Rotenburg, Germany.
Metab Brain Dis. 1998 Dec;13(4):361-77. doi: 10.1023/a:1020645110880.
An extensive psychometric test program was performed in 96 patients with proven liver cirrhosis and clinical signs of portal hypertension as well as in 20 patients with alcoholic pancreatitis, in 19 patients without cirrhosis but with alcoholic cerebral atrophy and in 163 normal controls. The study population comprised six groups of subjects as follows: Group 1. 27 patients with non-alcoholic cirrhosis and normal EEG pattern. Group 2. 48 patients with alcoholic cirrhosis and normal EEG pattern. Group 3. 21 patients with cirrhosis and minimal EEG changes. Group 4. 20 patients with alcoholic pancreatitis. Group 5. 19 patients without cirrhosis but with alcoholic cerebral atrophy. Group 6. 163 normal controls. A one way analysis of variances comparing asymptomatic patients (group 1, 2 and 4) with controls (group 6) revealed no significant differences between patients with alcoholic and non-alcoholic cirrhosis, both cirrhotic groups scoring significantly lower than patients with alcoholic pancreatitis and normal controls, who did not differ significantly. Comparing symptomatic patients (group 3 and 5) with normal controls both patient groups scored significantly lower than controls, the cirrhotic group (group 3) scoring significantly lower than patients with alcoholic cerebral atrophy. A two way analysis of variances revealed that in clinically asymptomatic patients cerebral functional defects revealed by psychometry are only due to cirrhosis and that in patients with clinical evidence of cerebral impairment the factors alcohol and cirrhosis are additive - not synergistic. A multiple group stepwise discriminant analysis revealed that tests evaluating psychomotor functions contributed most to the discrimination. Especially "line tracing " proved to be most sensitive and most specific followed by dexterity, steadiness, aiming, digit symbols in sensitivity and by reaction time, steadiness and dexterity in specificity. A test program for clinical use is proposed.
对96例已证实患有肝硬化且有门静脉高压临床体征的患者、20例酒精性胰腺炎患者、19例无肝硬化但有酒精性脑萎缩的患者以及163名正常对照者进行了广泛的心理测量测试。研究人群包括六组受试者,如下:第一组。27例非酒精性肝硬化且脑电图模式正常的患者。第二组。48例酒精性肝硬化且脑电图模式正常的患者。第三组。21例肝硬化且脑电图有轻微变化的患者。第四组。20例酒精性胰腺炎患者。第五组。19例无肝硬化但有酒精性脑萎缩的患者。第六组。163名正常对照者。对无症状患者(第一组、第二组和第四组)与对照者(第六组)进行的单因素方差分析显示,酒精性肝硬化患者和非酒精性肝硬化患者之间无显著差异,两个肝硬化组的得分均显著低于酒精性胰腺炎患者和正常对照者,而酒精性胰腺炎患者和正常对照者之间无显著差异。将有症状患者(第三组和第五组)与正常对照者进行比较,两个患者组的得分均显著低于对照者,肝硬化组(第三组)的得分显著低于酒精性脑萎缩患者。双因素方差分析显示,在临床无症状患者中,心理测量显示的脑功能缺陷仅归因于肝硬化,而在有脑损伤临床证据的患者中,酒精和肝硬化因素是相加的——而非协同的。多组逐步判别分析显示,评估心理运动功能的测试对判别贡献最大。尤其是“线追踪”被证明最敏感、最具特异性,其次是敏捷性、稳定性、瞄准能力、数字符号的敏感性以及反应时间、稳定性和敏捷性的特异性。提出了一个临床应用的测试方案。