Lackner J R, Levine M S
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1981 Aug;52(8):461-5.
The present experiment examined whether saccadic eye movements to visual targets are dependent on the perceived directions of the targets or on their retinally specified directions. Perceptual mislocalizations of visual targets were induced by having the target light attached to a subject's stationary hand while his biceps or triceps muscle was vibrated. Such vibration leads to apparent extension or flexion of the subject's restrained forearm and perceived visual motion of the stationary target light (6-8). Subjects always made accurate saccadic eye movements to a visual target, even when the target was perceptually mislocalized by as much as 20 degrees. By contrast, when subjects made saccadic eye movements to a nonvisual target, the location of their hand in the dark, they always looked to the perceived direction of the target even though it did not necessarily correspond to the true direction. These findings indicate that a distinction is maintained between "reflexive aspects" of oculomotor control related to foveation and the computation of perceived visual direction.
本实验研究了向视觉目标的扫视眼动是取决于目标的感知方向还是视网膜指定的方向。通过在受试者的二头肌或三头肌振动时将目标光附着在其静止的手上,诱发视觉目标的感知性定位错误。这种振动会导致受试者受约束的前臂出现明显的伸展或弯曲,并使静止的目标光产生视觉运动感知(6 - 8)。即使目标在感知上被错误定位多达20度,受试者总是能准确地向视觉目标进行扫视眼动。相比之下,当受试者向非视觉目标(即黑暗中他们手的位置)进行扫视眼动时,他们总是看向目标的感知方向,即使该方向不一定与真实方向相符。这些发现表明,与中央凹注视相关的眼动控制的“反射方面”和感知视觉方向的计算之间存在区别。