Suppr超能文献

癌胚抗原(CEA)的测定:两种不同检测方法的比较

Determination of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA): comparison of two different assays.

作者信息

Orjasaeter H

出版信息

Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand C. 1978 Dec;86C(6):265-75.

PMID:726896
Abstract

A comparison was made of CEA determination by the CEA-RIAKIT and our slightly modified CEA-Roche assays. The normal levels (mean + 2 SD) found in 63 blood donors were 2.3 microgram/1 and 3.3 microgram/1, respectively. The inter-assay reproducibility was similar in the range below 15 microgram/1, with variations from 0.3 microgram/1 (1 SD, less than 5 microgram/1) to 1.4 microgram/1 (1 SD, 10--15 microgram/1). Both methods measured CEA concentrations down to 1 microgram/1. The ability of the two assays to discriminate between positive and negative values in patients with urogenital and gastrointestinal cancer was similar. The response to recurrences of colorectal carcinoma was also similar, and the CEA fluctuation was parallel after surgery. The CEA-Roche assay generally showed good correlation between measured and theoretical values at both low and high levels. Under our test conditions, the disparity between indirect and direct values was 14 microgram/1 +/- 8 (n = 4) in the range 18--32 microgram/1, and this must be taken into consideration in interpreting the CEA-Roche test. The CEA-RIAKIT measured too low values as compared to both the CEA-Roche and the theoretical values. The discrepancy increased with increasing CEA values, and the ability to distinguish between high CEA concentrations (greater than 15 microgram/1) was poor. The explanation seems to be that the anti-CEA sera used in this assay show a lower affinity for plasma CEA than for tumour-extracted CEA. Immunochemical differences between sample CEA and CEA used for calibration of the standard curves must be considered in evaluation of CEA assays.

摘要

对使用CEA - RIAKIT和我们稍加改良的CEA - Roche检测法测定癌胚抗原(CEA)进行了比较。在63名献血者中测得的正常水平(均值 + 2标准差)分别为2.3微克/升和3.3微克/升。在低于15微克/升的范围内,两种检测法的批间重复性相似,变异范围为0.3微克/升(1标准差,低于5微克/升)至1.4微克/升(1标准差,10 - 15微克/升)。两种方法都能检测到低至1微克/升的CEA浓度。两种检测法区分泌尿生殖系统和胃肠道癌症患者CEA正负值的能力相似。对结直肠癌复发的反应也相似,术后CEA波动呈平行关系。CEA - Roche检测法在高低水平下测得值与理论值之间通常都有良好的相关性。在我们的检测条件下,在18 - 32微克/升范围内,间接值与直接值的差异为14微克/升±8(n = 4),在解释CEA - Roche检测结果时必须考虑这一点。与CEA - Roche检测法和理论值相比,CEA - RIAKIT测得的值过低。随着CEA值升高,差异增大,区分高CEA浓度(大于15微克/升)的能力较差。原因似乎是该检测法中使用的抗CEA血清对血浆CEA的亲和力低于对肿瘤提取的CEA的亲和力。在评估CEA检测法时,必须考虑样品CEA与用于校准标准曲线的CEA之间的免疫化学差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验