Rajapakse C, Grennan D M, Jones C, Wilkinson L, Jayson M
Rheumatol Rehabil. 1981 May;20(2):81-7. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/20.2.81.
The reproducibility and sensitivity of quantitative infra-red thermography as a measure of peripheral joint inflammation was reassessed. Experiments were carried out in a temperature-controlled room at 20 degrees C. Initial stabilization experiments showed that in normal, medium sized, joints, there was an initial rapid cooling phase followed by a slower cooling phase which lasted longer than two hours. In the knees the differences between normal and active rheumatoid joints increased the longer patients remained in the room but for practical reasons a 30-minute stabilization period was subsequently chosen. In views of hands and fingers, rebound increases in skin temperature after entering the room, together with lesser differences between inflamed and non-inflamed joints, were found. The results suggested that the thermographic technique examined was adequate for detecting inflammatory changes in knee, ankles and elbows but unsatisfactory for quantification of inflammation in the small joints of the hands.
重新评估了定量红外热成像作为外周关节炎症测量方法的可重复性和敏感性。实验在温度为20摄氏度的可控温室内进行。初始稳定性实验表明,在正常的中型关节中,最初有一个快速冷却阶段,随后是一个持续超过两小时的较慢冷却阶段。在膝盖部位,正常关节与活动性类风湿关节之间的差异随着患者在室内停留时间的延长而增大,但出于实际原因,随后选择了30分钟的稳定期。在手和手指方面,进入房间后皮肤温度出现反弹升高,且炎症关节与非炎症关节之间的差异较小。结果表明,所检测的热成像技术足以检测膝盖、脚踝和肘部的炎症变化,但对于手部小关节炎症的量化并不理想。