Suppr超能文献

无应激试验:多长时间足够?

The nonstress test: how long is enough?

作者信息

Brown R, Patrick J

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Nov 15;141(6):646-51. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(15)33305-6.

Abstract

Longer observation intervals might increase the positive predictive value of a nonreactive nonstress test (NST). One thousand one hundred and one NSTs were performed on 343 fetuses in 333 high-risk hospitalized patients. Recordings were terminated when five fetal heart rate (FHR) accelerations with movement occurred in any 20-minute period or after 120 minutes. The conclusion drawn was that the positive predictive value for morbidity and mortality of a nonreactive NST was 85.7% if conducted over 120 minutes, and that the negative predictive value for a reactive NST was 98.5%. A reactive NST was predictive of good fetal health regardless of the length of observation time necessary to demonstrate reactivity up to 120 minutes.

摘要

更长的观察间隔可能会提高无应激试验(NST)无反应型结果的阳性预测值。对333例高危住院患者的343例胎儿进行了1101次NST。当在任何20分钟时间段内出现5次伴有胎动的胎儿心率(FHR)加速或在120分钟后,记录终止。得出的结论是,如果NST持续120分钟以上,无反应型结果对于发病率和死亡率的阳性预测值为85.7%,而反应型结果的阴性预测值为98.5%。无论显示反应型结果所需的观察时间长短(最长120分钟),反应型NST都可预测胎儿健康状况良好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验