Klepac Robert K, Dowling John, Rokke Paul, Dodge Laura, Schafer Lorraine
Department of Psychology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, N.D. 58105, U.S.A.
Pain. 1981 Oct;11(2):241-246. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(81)90009-9.
In a 2 x 2 design, college student subjects described one of two levels of cold pressor pain (threshold or tolerance) with the McGill Pain Questionnaire administered via one of two modes (interview or paper-and-pencil). Interview administration was associated with higher scores on 5 of the 6 MPQ scores calculated. Data did not support the notion that this effect is entirely attributable to increased probability of interviewed subjects' endorsement of descriptors for which clarification of meaning was sought. Reliable effects of pain intensity and mode of administration significantly interact.
在一项2×2设计中，大学生受试者通过两种方式（访谈或纸笔作答）之一接受麦吉尔疼痛问卷，描述两种冷压痛水平（阈值或耐受性）中的一种。访谈式施测与计算出的6个MPQ分数中的5个分数较高相关。数据并不支持这种效应完全归因于接受访谈的受试者对寻求意义澄清的描述符认可概率增加这一观点。疼痛强度和施测方式的可靠效应存在显著交互作用。
