Suppr超能文献

组成型及致癌物衍生的DNA结合作为评估化学致癌物致癌效力的基础。

Constitutive and carcinogen-derived DNA binding as a basis for the assessment of potency of chemical carcinogens.

作者信息

Lutz W K

出版信息

Adv Exp Med Biol. 1981;136 Pt B:1349-65.

PMID:7344514
Abstract
  1. The hypothesis is presented that a ground-level DNA damage is unavoidable and must be regarding constitutive to a cell. The genotoxic agents responsible for this type of initiation comprise a number of physiological chemists which are known or suspected to be degraded via chemically reactive species, nitrosamines present in the diet or formed from amines in the stomach, ubiquitous carcinogenic metals, UV- and alpha-irradiation, viruses, and other sources in diet and environment. 2. It is concluded that what is normally called spontaneous tumor incidence is partly due to this constitutive DNA damage. 3. Under this assumption, carcinogens can be divided into two classes, the initiating (genotoxic, DNA-damaging) carcinogens and the non-genotoxic carcinogens which act by modulating any of a number of reactions and side reactions that lead to an increase of the constitutive DNA damage or enhance the chance for the constitutive DNA damage to proceed to a tumor. 4. The carcinogenic potency of a carcinogen is described as a product of persistent DNA damage x mutagenicity x non-genotoxic modulation of the DNA damage, and short-term tests are proposed to determine the contributions of the first two parameters to the potency of an initiating carcinogen. 5. As an approximation to this theoretical approach, a correlation is shown of DNA binding in vivo in the form of a "Covalent Binding Index" to the carcinogenic potency as derived from long-term bioassays. An astonishingly good linear correlation is found with an approximate uncertainty of the estimate of a factor of 10 with a total span of values of 10(6). 6. It is concluded that DNA binding in vivo provides a useful first look at the potency of initiating carcinogens but that additional knowledge is required to assess the organ specificity of initiating carcinogens. 7. The non-genotoxic carcinogens seem to be much less potent than the initiating carcinogens if administered alone. They cannot, however, be spotted on the basis of chemical structure, and there is no short-term test which would allow a good quantitative approach to their carcinogenic potency as was demonstrated for the initiating carcinogens. One main reason for this lack is the wide variety of different mechanisms of action of non-genotoxic carcinogens.
摘要
  1. 提出的假说认为,地面水平的DNA损伤是不可避免的,且必须被视为细胞的固有组成部分。导致这种起始类型的遗传毒性剂包括许多生理化学物质,已知或怀疑它们会通过化学反应性物种、饮食中存在的或胃中胺类形成的亚硝胺、普遍存在的致癌金属、紫外线和α辐射、病毒以及饮食和环境中的其他来源而降解。2. 得出的结论是,通常所说的自发肿瘤发生率部分归因于这种固有DNA损伤。3. 在这一假设下,致癌物可分为两类,即引发(遗传毒性、DNA损伤)致癌物和非遗传毒性致癌物,后者通过调节导致固有DNA损伤增加或增加固有DNA损伤发展为肿瘤几率的多种反应和副反应来发挥作用。4. 致癌物的致癌效力被描述为持续性DNA损伤×致突变性×DNA损伤的非遗传毒性调节的产物,并提出短期试验来确定前两个参数对引发致癌物效力的贡献。5. 作为这种理论方法的近似值,以“共价结合指数”形式显示了体内DNA结合与长期生物测定得出的致癌效力之间的相关性。发现了惊人的良好线性相关性,估计的近似不确定性为10倍,总数值范围为10⁶。6. 得出的结论是,体内DNA结合为初步了解引发致癌物的效力提供了有用信息,但评估引发致癌物的器官特异性还需要更多知识。7. 如果单独给药,非遗传毒性致癌物的效力似乎远低于引发致癌物。然而,不能根据化学结构来识别它们,而且没有短期试验能够像对引发致癌物那样对其致癌效力进行良好的定量评估。造成这种不足的一个主要原因是非遗传毒性致癌物的作用机制多种多样。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验