• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制药行业在儿科用药研发中的地位。

The position of the pharmaceutical industry in the development of drugs for pediatric use.

作者信息

Christensen C N

出版信息

Pediatr Pharmacol (New York). 1980;1(1):15-9.

PMID:7346727
Abstract

There is broad agreement that drugs to be used by children should be evaluated in children. Dosage and side effect information, in particular, cannot be reliably extrapolated from data derived from studies in adults. Few problems are encountered in obtaining adequate studies in children of drugs such as antibiotics which have a high potential for use in the pediatric age group. A large number of drugs will have limited use in children. They should be studied in children but the relative scarcity of qualified investigators, the limited patient population available for study, and ethical considerations dictate that the studies will be completed long after studies are completed in adults. These drugs should be allowed on the market before pediatric studies are completed, but there should be a commitment by the sponsor to complete the studies so that all drugs used by children will have adequate directions for use.

摘要

人们普遍认为,供儿童使用的药物应该在儿童身上进行评估。尤其是剂量和副作用信息,不能从成人研究数据中可靠地推断出来。在获得足够的针对抗生素等在儿科年龄组有高使用可能性的药物的儿童研究方面,几乎没有遇到问题。大量药物在儿童中的使用将受到限制。它们应该在儿童身上进行研究,但合格研究者相对稀缺、可供研究的患者群体有限以及伦理考量表明,这些研究将在成人研究完成很久之后才能完成。这些药物在儿科研究完成之前应该被允许上市,但申办者应该承诺完成研究,以便所有儿童使用的药物都有足够的使用说明。

相似文献

1
The position of the pharmaceutical industry in the development of drugs for pediatric use.制药行业在儿科用药研发中的地位。
Pediatr Pharmacol (New York). 1980;1(1):15-9.
2
Lack of pediatric drug formulations.缺乏儿科药物制剂。
Pediatrics. 1999 Sep;104(3 Pt 2):607-9.
3
[Are children getting the right drugs?].孩子们用对药了吗?
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2005 Dec 1;125(23):3290-2.
4
The economics of pediatric formulation development for off-patent drugs.非专利儿科药物制剂研发的经济学
Clin Ther. 2008 Nov;30(11):2133-45. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.11.019.
5
Criteria supporting the study of drugs in the newborn.支持新生儿药物研究的标准。
Clin Ther. 2006 Sep;28(9):1385-98. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.09.007.
6
Stimulation programs for pediatric drug research--do children really benefit?儿科药物研究的刺激计划——儿童真的从中受益了吗?
Eur J Pediatr. 2007 Aug;166(8):849-55. doi: 10.1007/s00431-006-0381-z. Epub 2007 Jan 17.
7
Children on losing end of access to new drugs.
AIDS Alert. 1998 Jan;13(1):10-2.
8
[General problems posed by prescription medications in children. Point of view of the clinician].[儿童处方药带来的一般问题。临床医生的观点]
Therapie. 1989 Mar-Apr;44(2):133-5.
9
Advances in pediatric pharmacology, therapeutics, and toxicology.儿科药理学、治疗学和毒理学的进展。
Adv Pediatr. 2001;48:439-64.
10
Pharmacological research in pediatrics: From neonates to adolescents.儿科药理学研究:从新生儿到青少年
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2006 Apr 20;58(1):4-14. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2005.12.001. Epub 2006 Mar 13.