Suppr超能文献

儿科药物研究的刺激计划——儿童真的从中受益了吗?

Stimulation programs for pediatric drug research--do children really benefit?

作者信息

Boots Isabelle, Sukhai Rám N, Klein Richard H, Holl Robert A, Wit Jan M, Cohen Adam F, Burggraaf Jacobus

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Willem Alexander Kinder- en Jeugdcentrum, LUMC, Postbus 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Pediatr. 2007 Aug;166(8):849-55. doi: 10.1007/s00431-006-0381-z. Epub 2007 Jan 17.

Abstract

Most drugs that are currently prescribed in pediatrics have not been tested in children. Pediatric drug studies are stimulated in the USA by the pediatric exclusivity provision under the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act (FDAMA) that grants patent extensions when pediatric labeling is provided. We investigated the effectiveness of these programs in stimulating drug research in children, thereby increasing the evidence for safe and effective drug use in the pediatric population. All drugs granted pediatric exclusivity under the FDAMA were analyzed by studying the relevant summaries of medical and clinical pharmacology reviews of the pediatric studies or, if these were unavailable, the labeling information as provided by the manufacturer. A systematic search of the literature was performed to identify drug utilization patterns in children. From July 1998 to August 2006, 135 drug entities were granted pediatric exclusivity. Most frequent drug groups were anti-depressants and mood stabilizers, ACE inhibitors, lipid-lowering preparations, HIV antivirals, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and anti-rheumatic drugs. The distribution of the different drugs closely matched the distribution of these drugs over the adult market, and not the drug utilization by children. Many drug studies in children have been performed since the introduction of the FDAMA. However, children infrequently use the drugs granted pediatric exclusivity. The priorities for pediatric drug research should be set by the need of the patients, not by market considerations.

摘要

目前儿科中所开的大多数药物都未在儿童身上进行过测试。在美国,《食品药品管理现代化法案》(FDAMA)中的儿科专属条款刺激了儿科药物研究,该条款规定,若提供儿科用药标签,则给予专利延期。我们调查了这些项目在刺激儿童药物研究方面的有效性,从而增加在儿科人群中安全有效用药的证据。通过研究儿科研究的医学和临床药理学综述的相关摘要,或者在无法获取这些摘要时,研究制造商提供的标签信息,对所有根据FDAMA获得儿科专属权的药物进行了分析。对文献进行了系统检索,以确定儿童的药物使用模式。从1998年7月到2006年8月,有135种药物实体获得了儿科专属权。最常见的药物类别是抗抑郁药和情绪稳定剂、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、降脂制剂、抗艾滋病毒药物以及非甾体抗炎和抗风湿药物。不同药物的分布与这些药物在成人市场上的分布密切匹配,而不是与儿童的药物使用情况匹配。自FDAMA出台以来,已经进行了许多儿童药物研究。然而,儿童很少使用获得儿科专属权的药物。儿科药物研究的重点应该由患者的需求来确定,而不是由市场因素来决定。

相似文献

8
The march toward rational therapeutics in children.儿童合理治疗学的发展进程。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2003 Dec;22(12):1119-23. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000101846.83256.5a.
10
Criteria supporting the study of drugs in the newborn.支持新生儿药物研究的标准。
Clin Ther. 2006 Sep;28(9):1385-98. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.09.007.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
A literature review on off-label drug use in children.关于儿童超说明书用药的文献综述。
Eur J Pediatr. 2005 Sep;164(9):552-8. doi: 10.1007/s00431-005-1698-8. Epub 2005 May 24.
2
3
Clinical trials in children.儿童临床试验。
Lancet. 2004;364(9436):803-11. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16942-0.
10
Medicines for children licensed by the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products.欧洲药品评估局批准的儿童用药。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2002 Nov;58(8):495-500. doi: 10.1007/s00228-002-0511-0. Epub 2002 Sep 25.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验